There are some well-known living trees in the world today. Consider this list: (1) The General Sherman. It is a Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron Giganteum) located in Sequoia National Park in California. It is reported to be, by volume, the largest single-stem tree in the world. Its height is 274.9 feet. Its circumference at ground is 102.6 feet (The General Sherman Tree, nps.gov). (2) The Hyperion. It is a Coastal Redwood (Sequoia Sempervirens) located in Redwood National Park in California. It is reported to be the tallest tree in the world. Its height is 380.8 feet. Its diameter is about 16.2 feet or about 50.9 feet in circumference (Tallest Tree Living, guinessworldrecords.com). (3) The Methuselah Tree. It is a Great Basin Bristlecone Pine (Pinus Longaeva) located in the Inyo National Forest in eastern California. It is believed to be the oldest living tree, over 4,700 years old (Methuselah, a Bristlecone Pine is Thought to be the Oldest Living Organism on Earth, usda.gov). (4) The Great Banyon Tree of India. it is a Banyon Tree (Ficus Benghalensis) located in the Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose India Botanic Garden in Howrah, India (near Kolkata). This multi-trunk tree spreads over more than 4.6 acres (Story of the Great Banyon, World’s Largest Banyan Tree, timesofidia.com). (5) The Big Tree at Goose Island. It is a Virginia Live Oak (Quercus Virginiana) located in Goose Island State Park near Rockport, Texas. Its height is 44 feet. Its circumference is about 36 feet. Its spread is about 90 feet (The Big Tree at Goose Island State Park by Eva Frederick, tpwmagazine.com). This tree is estimated to be over 1,000 years old (The Big Tree at Goose Island State Park to Receive Special Care, Feb. 08, 2016, by Katy Schaffer, tpwd.texas.gov).
Two special trees are mentioned in the Garden of Eden. These are known by name to Bible Students. Let’s notice.
The Tree of Life
“And out of the ground the LORD God made every tree grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” (Genesis 2:9).
What do we know about the Tree of Life? It had healing or regenerative benefits to man (Genesis 3:22; Revelation 22:1-2). There are some plants that have beneficial properties [Aloe Vera is beneficial in treating burns and is anti-inflammatory. Ginger is thought to help with digestion, nausea relief, and to be anti-inflammatory. Lavender is thought to have a calming effect. Willow bark contains a chemical called Salicin and has similar effects as aspirin. It helps with pain and fever. Eucalyptus is used to help with respiratory problems and seems to reduce inflammation. Peppermint is anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial. Hikers sometime chew peppermint before drinking from a stream in order to reduce harmful microbes. These are some of the many beneficial plants which our Creator provided]. However, one could “live forever” by eating from this tree. Man lost access to this tree due to sin (Genesis 3:22-24).
In the book of Revelation, those who overcome will have access to the Tree of Life (Revelation 2:7; 22:1-2). Overcome what? Here are some things that we are to overcome: (1) The world (1 John 5:4-5); (2) The wicked one (1 John 2:13-14); (3) Self (cf. 1 Corinthians 9:27). How can we overcome? The answer is found in the blood of Christ and our faith (Revelation 12:11 cf. 7:13-14; 1 John 5:4). Eternal life is possible.
The Tree of Life is used as a comparison in the book of Proverbs. Wisdom (Proverbs 3:13 cf. 3:18), righteousness (Proverbs 11:30) and a wholesome tongue (Proverbs 15:4) are compared to the Tree of Life. These things have life and healing properties in them.
The Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil
“And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, ‘of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die” (Genesis 2:16-17).
Why did God create this tree and then tell man not to eat? (1) The tree may have been beneficial to man in other ways. It may have provided shade. It may have provided beauty to the garden. (2) It provided a test of faith. Would they trust God? Would they trust Him even when they did not understand why. (3) It provided a test of wills. Would God’s will or man’s will rule? That is, would man submit to God? Would man allow God to be God, or would man seek to be his own God?
Why was this tree called The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? (1) Some think that mankind did not know the difference between right and wrong before they ate. But this can’t be. They knew that they were not to eat (Genesis 3:1-3). (2) Some think that they did not fully know the difference between good and evil before they ate. That is, they did not understand the consequences of disobeying God, as they would. This is a possible explanation. (3) This has to do with man trying to be like God. “As the serpent correctly noted, ‘knowing good and evil’ (Genesis 3:5, B.H.) can also mean being the one who determines what is good and what is evil. That is what is meant in this verse (Genesis 3:22 B.H.) by ‘man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil'” (Dennis Prager, The Rational Bible: Genesis, p. 59). I believe this is the meaning of the tree’s name. (There may also be some irony and sarcasm in the words of Genesis 3:22. They clearly were not like God in every sense).
You know the rest of the story. The serpent tempted Eve in three ways (The same three ways that we are tempted): (1) The Lust of the Flesh = good for food; (2) The Lust of the Eyes = pleasant to the eyes; (3) The Pride of Life = desirable to make one wise and you will be like God, knowing good and evil (Genesis 3:5-6 cf. 1 John 2:15-17). Both Eve and Adam ate. Far from being equal with God, following their sin, Adam and Eve were afraid and tried to hide from God (Genesis 3:6-10). They were cast out of the garden and cut-off from The Tree of Life (Genesis 3:22-24).
Questions for us:
- Do we trust God, or do we think that he is keeping us from something good?
- Who determines good and evil in our lives? Is it God, or do we?
A Talking Serpent, A Talking Donkey, Caring Ravens, and A Man-Swallowing Fish
The Bible contains some events that some people find hard to believe. Let’s consider four of these.
1. The Serpent (Genesis 3)“Now the serpent… he said to the woman” (Genesis 3:1). How could a serpent talk?
We should understand that the tempter is actually the devil (cf. Revelation 12:9; 20:2; John 8:44; 2 Corinthians 11:3, 14). He appeared to Eve in the form of a serpent. He can transform himself into an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14). God has, at times, granted him certain power over nature (e.g. Job 1:6-19; 2:6-8).
Why would Eve speak with a serpent? This may be due to her being in a trusting, naive state at this point. We do not know how long Adam and Eve had been in the garden at this point.
The curse of the serpent going on its belly and eating dust is a picture of humiliation or defeat (cf. Genesis 3:14; Psalm 72:8-9; Isaiah 49:23; 65:25; Micah 7:16-17). The serpent on its belly is a symbol of Satan’s humiliation.
There is an important lesson we should not miss. We should reject temptation no matter who presents it, and no matter what form it comes to us.
2. The Donkey (Numbers 22) “Then the LORD opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam…” (Numbers 22:28). How could a donkey speak?
The answer is plainly stated. The LORD caused this to happen. The real issue is: Do we have faith in God and in his power?
Why would Balaam speak with a donkey? Anger is likely the answer. Devin W. Dean comments, “Consider what anger had done to Balaam; When God grants the donkey the ability to speak, Balaam just goes right into the conversation. Anger has blinded him even to the miracle being performed in front of his eyes” (Editor Stan Crowley, Studies in Numbers and Deuteronomy, the Eighteenth Annual Schertz Lectures, p. 243).
There are a few important lessons we should not miss. (1) God should be feared. The donkey seems to fear the Angel of the LORD more than Balaam fears the LORD. (2) One should be careful when he is angry. Anger seems to have temporarily blinded Balaam to reality. (3) One should not rashly or quickly turn against a servant with a history of loyal service. Balaam was ready to kill his donkey even though the donkey had been a loyal servant in the past (Numbers 22:23-30). Moreover, the donkey saved Balaam’s life on this occasion (Numbers 22:31-33). (4) One should be willing to listen to reason and receive truth, no matter who speaks it. One writer states it this way: “However God speaks to you listen up… Do you find it hard to believe that your wife’s counsel could be the voice of God? However God speaks to you, listen up! Do you get tired of the preacher telling you to open up your hand to the poor and give liberally? However God speaks to you, listen up!” (Calvin Miller, Preaching: The Art of Narrative Exposition, p. 109). “Test all things; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil” (1 Thessalonians 5:21-22).
3. The Ravens (1 Kings 17).
“The ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening; and he drank from the brook” (1 Kings 17:6). How could ravens feed Elijah?
The answer is plainly stated. The LORD commanded them to do this (1 Kings 17:1-5). The Bible indicates that God can control animals (e.g. Genesis 2:19; 6:20; 7:8-9; 1 Kings 17:1-6; Daniel 6:22; Jonah 1:17; 2:10). [However, did you know that there have been many reports of crows and ravens bringing gifts to people who feed or show kindness to them? They are very smart.]
There is another interpretation which has been suggested. Some believe that this does not refer to birds but to people, the inhabitance of Oreb (raven) or Orbo (e.g. Pulpit Commentaries, Clark Commentary, studylight.org). I am not convinced that there is an adequate reason to draw this conclusion.
Here are a few possible lessons. (1) Some blessings are conditional. Elijah had to be in the place God specified to receive the food from the ravens (1 Kings 17:1-6). (2) God may use the unclean to accomplish good. The raven was an unclean animal (Leviticus 11:13-15). (3) It is possible to bring clean food to another and still be unclean oneself. Charles Spurgeon said, “But see too how possible it is for us to carry bread and meat to God’s servants, and do some good things for his church, and be ravens still!” (enduringword.com).
4. The Sea Creature (Jonah 1-2).
“Now the LORD had prepared a great fish to swallow Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights… so the LORD spoke to the fish, and it vomited Jonah onto dry land” (Jonah 1:17; 2:10). There are certain commonly asked questions about this.
What was this, a fish or a whale? It is called a fish (Jonah 1:17; 2:1; 2:10; Matthew 12:40 NKJV). Some have rendered it as a whale (e.g. Matthew 12:40 KJV). The Hebrew word is dahg. Apologetics Press says this in their Defending the Faith Study Bible, “we conclude… that the word used in the book of Jonah… refers indiscriminately to any type of fish… However, a point of clarification need to be sounded even here. According to the present zoological nomenclature, a ‘whale’ is not a ‘fish’ – it is classified as a mammal. Hebrew linguistic experts note no such distinction in the terms used in the Old Testament. The ordinary term for ‘fish’ (dahg) would not necessarily exclude the whale in its application. God was under no obligation to classify animals thousands of years ago according to our modern classification scheme” (p. 1653). The Greek word is ketos. Apologetics Press says this, “The Septuagint translators (Greek translation of the Old Testament – B.H.) used the same term in their rendering or Jonah 1:17… Arndt Gingrich offers only one definition of ketos – ‘sea monster’… Thayer lists three terms “sea monster, whale, huge fish,’ with the reference to ‘whale’ being merely one possibility” (p. 1636). We cannot narrow this down anymore.
Could this really happen? Notice that it says that God “prepared” this great fish to swallow Jonah (Jonah 1:17). [God prepared four things in this book for Jonah (1) great fish (1:17); (2) plant (4:6); (3) worm (4:7); (4) east wind (4:8)]. Wayne Jackson comments, “Commentators have assembled a number of cases in which huge sharks or whales have swallowed creatures larger than a man (Robinson 1957, 78-79), but such examples actually are irrelevant, for the text states that the Lord ‘prepared’ (appointed) this creature for a specific purpose” (Wayne Jackson, The Prophets, p. 417).
Could one really survive three days and three nights in the belly of the fish? If one does not deny the power of God, then it is certainly possible. If one denies God such power, then the message of the Bible falls apart (e.g. creation, inspiration, prophecy, virgin birth, resurrection.). However, some think that it is possible that Jonah died. He said, “out of the belly of Sheol I cried” (Jonah 2:1) and “You have brought up my life from the pit” (Jonah 2:6). Is this literal language or figurative language?
Here are a couple of lessons. (1) It is far better to listen to God than to go against him. (2) Jonah coming forth after three days and three nights are a type of Jesus being resurrected after three days and three nights (Matthew 12:39-40). Do you believe in the power of God?
Share this: