Questions About The Flood

“But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriages, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. Then two men will be in the field: one will be taken and the other will be left. Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken and the other left.” (Matthew 24:37-41)

“A few, that is, eight souls were saved through water” (1 Peter 3:20).

“God . . . .   did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly (2 Peter 2:4-5).

“The world that then exist perished, being flooded with water” (2 Peter 3:6).

The flood fascinates Bible students. It serves as a type of end of the world and judgment to come. It has been the topic of multitude of books, including: The Genesis Flood by John Whitcomb, Jr and Henry Morris; Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study by John Woodmorappe; The World That Perished by John Whitcomb. The Noahic Flood by Curtis Cates; A Study of The Biblical Flood by Marion Fox. The Global Flood of Noah by Bert Thompson.

There are common questions which are asked about the flood. These questions are sometimes asked by skeptics, but many times by sincere Bible students. The writing will provide concise answers to some of these common questions.

1.  Was the flood a global or local flood?

(a) It must be admitted that the language sounds like a global flood. (Genesis 6:13; 7:4; 7:19; 7:21-23; 8:9. 2 Peter 2:5; 3:3-7). If one wanted to describe a global flood, this is the language one would use.

(b) If the flood was not global, why was an ark needed? Noah and his family could have migrated to another place. God could have directed the animals to higher ground.

(c) What flood ever lasted one year and ten days (Genesis 7:7-11 cf 8:13-19)?

(d) If the flood was not global, then what meaning would the rainbow promise have (Genesis 9:8-17)?

Great local floods still occur: (1) In 1931, the Yellow River of China flooded killing an estimated one million.  (2) In 1887, the Yellow River flooded an area larger than Great Britain killing 900,000. (3) In 1938, the Yellow River flooded killing 500,000. (4) In 1642, the Yellow River flooded killing 300,000. (5) In 2004 a tsunami in the India Ocean killed at least 230,000 in fourteen countries. (6) In 2011, a tsunami: killed 15,884 in Japan. (7) In 1900 a storm-surge swept Galveston Island, TX. killing perhaps as many as 8,000. (8) In 1889, the Johnstown, PA. flood killed 2,209. (9) In 2005, hurricane Katrina killed 1,836 in New Orleans, LA.

2. Could the Ark really hold all those animals?

(a) Not all of the animals had to be on the Ark. The animals brought on board included those “in whose nostrils was the breath of life” (Genesis 6:17; 7:22).  Fish would not need to be on the Ark. Aquatic mammals would not need to be on the ark. Insects would not need to be on the ark. They do not breathe through the nostrils but by diffusion and some could survive upon debris. Some reptiles and amphibians may not have been on board the ark. Worms would not have needed to be no board the ark. It is possible that some seabirds were not boarded on the ark.

(b) Not every “species” of animal was boarded but every “kind” (Genesis 6:19-10; 7:14). “kind” refers to animals that can reproduce, or are the results of normal reproduction, syngameons (cf Genesis 1). For example: Dog is a kind (not every variety a different find). The genetic potential for future variety of species is within the kind.

(c) Nothing requires that the animals had to be adults. For example: A 4 or 5 pound Komodo dragon could have been aboard instead of a 200-300 pound adult.

(d) The ark was large, John Whitcomb has written “Its capacity was equivalent to 520 modern railroad stock cars” (The World That Perished, p. 231). Brad Harrub has written “in 1980, Ernst Mayr, a very famous evolutionary taxonomist, published a book titled Principles of Systematic Zoology. In his book he outlined every creature we knew of that was alive on the earth. According to Mayr’s own numbers, Noah would have provided protection for: 3,700 Mammals, 8,600 Birds; 6,300 Reptiles, 2,500 Amphibians . . . Thus 21,000 different species. . . If we use the ‘species’ definition, the total number of individual animals that would need protection on the ark would be approximately 50,000. If we average these 50,000 to the size of a sheep . . . then we can ask the question: Can we get 50,000 sheep-size animals on thee ark? Well consider that one boxcar is capable of holding 240 ‘sheep-sized’ animals. Thus, we could place 125,000 sheep-sized animals into 520 boxcars – and yet we only had to get 50,000! That would have left plenty of room for Noah, his family, and all of the food necessary” (Convicted, p 262). Remember that not every “species” but every “kind” was on board. John Woodmorappe’s book claims,  “If …the created kind was the equivalent to the family (at least in the case of mammals and birds), then there were only about 2,000 animals on the Ark” (Noah`s Ark: A Feasibility Study, p. 7).

3. How did Noah gather all the animals?

He did not have to gather them. They came to him (Genesis 6:20; 7:9 cf 2:19).

4. How could all the various animals journey from the various continents? And what about the climatic differences.

The world then was radically different. The continents may have been joined (Pangaea). The species may not have been as isolated and thus so genetically diverse. The climate would not have been so extreme across the earth. Professor Alfred Wallace said, “There is but one climate known to the ancient fossil world as revealed by the plants and animals entombed in the rocks, and the climate was a mantle of spring – like loveliness which seemed to have prevailed continuously over the whole globe” (Wayne Jackson, The Book of Job, p. 118).

5. How could the animals enter in one day (Genesis 7:13-15)?

“Keil Delitzson State: Verse 13 . . . pluperfect ‘had come’ . . . The idea is not that Noah, with his family and all the animals, entered the ark on the very day on which the rain began, but that on that day he had entered, had completed the entering, which occupied the seven days between the giving of the command (v. 4) and the commencement of the flood (v. 10.) (p. 145)” (Marion Fox, pp 267-268). John Woodmorappe’s book reasons, “Let us assume that the larger animals entered the Ark no faster than do animals of comparable size when killed in and processed in slaughterhouses (i.e., 1000 hogs per hour…) smaller animals, of course, must have boarded the Ark at a rate of several times that of larger ones. It is easy to see that 16,000 animals could have boarded the Ark in, at most, five hours. Of course this assumes single-file entry, but there is no why several lines of animals could not have entered simultaneously, especially the many small to medium animals. Scripture, of corse does not inform us about the width of the Ark door” (Noah`s Ark: A Feasibility Study, p. 63).

6. How did Noah and his family care for so many animals.

(a) The short answer is not that we do not know the Bible does not tell us.

(b) John Woodmorappe goes into great detail about how the feeding, watering and waste management could have been accomplished without supernatural intervention. His book Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study is reasonably thought out.

(c) We are told that God “remembered” Noah and his family (Genesis 8:1). The Hebrew word zakar, translated “remember,” suggests God’s continued watchful care over all the occupants of the ark” (Bert Thompson and Brad Harrub, An Examination of Noah’s Ark and the Global Flood).

Some theorize that God could have put the animals into hibernation, and slowed their metabolism and stopped their reproductive abilities. This is possible. However, the Bible is silent on this subject.

(d) We know that there were “rooms” on the ark (Genesis 6:14). Marion Fox writes “The Hebrew word translated “rooms” (Genesis 6:14) is found 13 times in the Bible and is translated ‘nest(s)’ in the other 12 times it is found. It seems evident that this refers to cages into which the animals entered and stayed during the flood” (A Study of The Biblical Flood, p. 260).

7. Where did the water go?

Psalm 104:6-9: “Thou didst cover it with deep as a garment; the waters were standing above the mountains. At Thy rebuke, they fled; at the sound of Thy thunder they hurried away. The mountains rose; the valleys sank down to the place which thou didst established for them. Thou didst set boundary that they may not pass over that they may not return to cover the earth” (NASB). I believe that the earth was shaped differently. The oceans were not so deep and the mountains were not so high.

8. Why were the unclean animals saved in pairs, but the clean animals saved in sevens (Gen 7:2-3, 8-9)?

The Bible does not tell us some have suggested that it was for ecological balance. Animals to be eaten by man (cf Genesis 9:3), used in sacrifice by man (cf Genesis 8:20), and common prey for other animals would be in large measure clean animals. Keep in mind that the unclean animals would also have carrion (dead carcasses) for feed. We do know that Noah sacrificed one of each kind of clean animal to the Lord  (Genesis 8:20).

Posted in Apologetics, Evidence, Judgment, Stats | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Assembling and Evangelism

A common but faulty view exists concerning the purpose of the worship assembly.  Some have thought that the church’s worship assemblies should primarily be geared toward the non-Christian.  Some have thought that the best place for evangelism is the worship assembly.

There are two primary functions of the worship assembly.  The worship assembly is first and foremost about worshipping God (Acts 20:7; 1 Corinthians 11:26-29).  The worship assembly also serves the function of encouraging and edifying and comforting the saints (Hebrews 10:24-25; Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16; 1 Corinthians 14:19, 26b, 31).

Evidently, the early church did have non-members visit the assembly (1 Corinthians 14:20-23).  Our worship assemblies should be considerate of non-members (1 Corinthians 14:20-23).  However, brother Dan Owen has remarked, “While 1 Corinthians 14:20-23 certainly indicates that what is done in our worship services should be plain and understandable to those who are visiting, it is not a fair reading of the text to say that the main goal of New Testament worship was the winning of outsiders…”

As one reads the book of Acts, one finds evangelism occurring outside of the worship assemblies.  Evangelism was done in homes and private settings (e.g., Saul, Cornelius, Philippian jailer), public places of various kinds [(e.g. in synagogues, on public roads (e.g. the Ethiopian), by a river side (e.g. Lydia) in market places, on Mars’ Hill] and even in meetings  with rulers (e.g, Felix, Festus, Agrippa).  But how many do you recall being converted, in the book of Acts, from attending a church’s worship assembly?  I can’t think of one.

Brethren, if the church is going to grow we must not limit evangelism to the worship assembly.  Those that attend are good prospects. However, evangelism must occur outside the church assembly if we are going to grow.  Furthermore, it is essential if we are going to follow the New Testament pattern.

  “Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields, for they are white already to harvest!” (John 4:35).

Posted in Christian Influence, Chruch, Meaning and Purpose, Soul Winning, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is God Egotistical?

BACK GROUND: The following is a letter that I wrote some years ago to a man who called in on a talk radio program which I hosted. He was related to one of the local church members who attended with me. He wanted to know if it was egotistical of God to want us to worship Him. I briefly answered his question on air. I also followed up with a letter. Here is a summary of the letter.

Dear John (not real name),

I am excited about your inquiry.  It demonstrates a desire on your part to know and understand God better.

You ask why God would demand worship from humanity.  Is He an egotist?  Is He vain?  Is He self-absorbed?

Nothing could be farther from the truth!  Acts 17:24-25 says, “God who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. Nor is He worshipped with men’s hands, as though He needed anything (Emphasis mine), since He gives to all life, breath, and all things.”  None of us really add glory (beauty) or honor (weight) to His essence.  He does not depend on man. He needs nothing from man (read 2 Samuel 7; 1 Chronicles 17; Acts 7:47-50; and Acts 17:22-28).

Yes, He does receive joy and pleasure from man’s doing what is right (read Psalm 149:4; Luke 15:7, 10,32; 2 Corinthians 2:15; Philippians 4:18).  Yes, He wants to spend eternity with us (see Matthew 25:34; John 17:24).  But, God needs nothing from man.  It is man who needs God.

It is not that He needs our praise.  It is we who need to praise Him.  One man, Leroy Brownlow, observed, “No man can be truly happy who regards himself alone.  The unhappiest person and the most self-centered person I know are one in the same person.”  Again, he wrote, “As the little flower seed never becomes beautiful and fragrant until it breaks out of itself, and grows up and blossoms, so it is with man.”

Now God is certainly worthy of praise and honor for all that He’s done; But it is really we who need to give praise.  It gives man something bigger than self to live for each day.  Consider Romans 15:5-7.  God brought Jew and Gentile together.  He brought men of different backgrounds and nationalities together.  How did He do this?  He got man to look to Him and focus upon Him instead of self and local pride.

Read also 1 Corinthians 1.  Division and strife were a great problem at Corinth.  If my count is right, Jesus is mentioned by name (Jesus), title (Christ, Lord), and personal pronoun (Him, His) 13 times in the first 13 verses.  It is as if Paul is telling them that if they take their eyes off of Him, and place them on man, that division will be the result.  He said, “Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no division among you, but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment… Is Christ divided?  Was Paul crucified for you?  Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Corinthians 1:10, 13).  Man needs something to focus on larger than himself.  In 1 Corinthians 10:17 Paul writes, “For we, though many, are one bread, and one body; for we are all partake of that one bread.”

I hope this brief letter helps.  I am available for anything I can help you with in understanding His will.

May God bless you.

[signed]

Bryan Hodge

Posted in God, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

We Have An Advocate

1 John 2:1, “My little children, these things write I unto you, so that you may not sin.  And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.”

John refers to them as “little children” (1 John 2:1,12,13,18,28; 3:7,18; 4:4; 5:21), John is an aged man at this point (2 John 1; 3 John 1) and he cares for them the way a father would his children (cf. 1 Thessalonians 2:11; 2 Corinthians 12:14).

He wrote unto them that they “may not sin.”  The word is aorist tense; That is, John did not want them to sin at all.  He wanted to help them keep clear of sin.  Inspired instruction certainly helps in keeping men from sin (Psalm 119:11). A christian should strive to live a holy life, free from sin.

However, we do sin. What happens when we do sin?  Are we without hope?  John says, “And (Kai – the word may be rendered ‘but’ depending upon the context and most likely should be in this context, see ESV) if (at times this word approaches the meaning of whenever, or when cf. 1 John 2:28) anyone sins (aorist tense, denoting an instance of sin, it is in the singular in the KJV) we have (present tense; the force of which is ‘we keep on having’ even after baptism!) an Advocate (a defense attorney) with (pros – the word lit. means before or facing) the Father…”  This Advocate is said to be Jesus Christ.

How does this advocate defend us?  By arguing that the law is unjust and thus should not be enforced? No! With some fancy legal maneuvers?  No!  By looking for loopholes in the law?  No!  By appealing to the emotions of the Judge and jury?  Certainly not!

How then?  1 John 2:2 reads, “And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins.”  I have heard it expressed this way: This lawyer’s methods are highly unusual – (1) He admits his client’s guilt; (2) He pays the price with his own blood (1 John 2:2).

Does this deny human conditions for the Christian’s forgiveness?  No, no more than it does for the alien sinner.  Watch the words, “and not for ours only but also for the whole world” (1 John 2:2b).  Certainly, there are conditions to be met for the child of God to be forgiven ( see 1 John 1:9; also Acts 8:22). However, these conditions are not being emphasized at this point. What is being emphasized is that we have an Advocate. We are not without hope.

Wayne Jackson wisely observed, “While many Bible students are aware of the fact that the blood of Jesus is applied to their souls in their initial obedience to the gospel … some do not realize that the Lord’s cleansing blood continues to function on their behalf as they struggle with sin in their christian lives” (Notes From the Margin of My Bible, vol. 2, pp. 163-164).  Yes, even after baptism one could not be forgiven without the great propitiation  of Christ; without the blood of Christ all the repentance and confession in the world would not avail.

Posted in Jesus, Plan of salvation, Sin, Textual study, Word Study | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In The News: Auctioning Virginity

CBS reported on April 30, 2014 – “An American medical student is auctioning off her virginity to the highest bidder… the top offer currently stands at $550,000… using the alias ‘Elizabeth Raine’… the 28-year-old self-proclaimed virgin said she is willing to submit to a medical examination or polygraph as proof to the winning bidder, which will be determined when the bidding concludes on May 7… Nevada is the only state in the United States where prostitution is legal.  She will reportedly engage in the sexual intercourse in Australia as a way of circumventing American prostitution laws… Bidders from Serbia, Japan, Australia, the U.K. and the U.S. have already placed successive bids of more than $100,000 since April 1” (CBS Las Vegas).

Update: New York Daily News reported on May 9, that Elizabeth Raine had cancelled the offer.  She said she that would focus on her studies. The highest bid had reached $801,000.  Since the bidding began on April Fool’s Day, one wonders if it was but a joke.

However, let’s ask – For what would you sell your soul?  “What will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his own soul?  Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?” (Mark 8:36-37).

George Bernard Shaw told the story of asking a woman “Would you sleep with me for 1,000,000 pounds?”  Her answer was “yes”.  He then asked, “How about 5 pounds?”.  Her reply was, “What kind of woman do you think I am?”  His response, “We’ve already established that.  Now we’re just haggling over the price.”  What kind of person are you?

Posted in Ethics, Money, Sex | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Apple of the Eye

The human eye is quite amazing. In his book, The Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin wrote, “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree” (page 227). “It is scarcely possible to avoid comparing the eye with a telescope. We know that this instrument has been perfected by long-continued efforts of the highest human intellects.” (page 231). “The belief that an organ so perfect as the eye could have formed by natural selection, is enough to stagger anyone…” (page 259 – All quotes from the 1998 edition of the Modern Library Paperback edition). Dr. Robert Jastrow remarked, “The eye is a marvelous instrument, resembling a telescope of the highest quality, with a lens, an adjustable focus, a variable diaphragm for controlling the amount of light, and optical corrections for spherical and chromatic aberration. They eye appears to have been designed; no designer of telescopes could have done better. How could this marvelous instrument have evolved by chance?” (The Enchanted Loom: Mind and Universe, 1981, page 96-97 – quoted on page 56 of Wayne Jackson’s book, “The Human Body: Accident or Design?, 1993). Wayne Jackson has written, “The mechanism of the eye is extremely complex. Light images from the environment enter the eye (at 186,000 miles per second) through the Iris, which opens and shuts like the diaphragm of a camera, to let in just the right amount of light. The images move through a lens, which focuses the ‘picture’ (in an inverted form) on the retina at the rear of the eyeball. The image is then picked up by some 137 million nerve endings that convey the message (at 300 miles per hour) to the brain for processing.   No wonder even secular writers are prone to speak of ‘the miraculous team work of your eye and brain’” (ibid). Dr. Bert Thompson has written, “…the eye is infinitely more complex than any man-made camera. It can handle 1.5 million simultaneous messages, and gathers 80% of all the knowledge absorbed by the brain. The retina covers less than a square inch, and contains 137 million light-sensitive receptor cells, 130 million rods (allowing the eye to see in black and white), and 7 million cones (allowing the eye to see in full color). In the average day, the eye moves about 100,000 times, using muscles that, milligram for milligram, are among the body’s strongest. The body would have to walk 50 miles to exercise the leg muscles an equal amount” (Essays in Apologetics IV, page 189-190, 1990).

The wording of our title, The Apple of the Eye, appears in the Bible 5 times in some form(No, Stevie Wonder did not coin this phrase in his song You Are The Sunshine Of My Life). Let us look and learn what is meant.

First passage: Deuteronomy 32:10. These are among the final words which the great man, Moses, uttered before his death. The context actually begins back in verse 7. Moses says basically, “Many of you are too young to know some of these things first hand. But some of this history generations past could testify. Moreover , some of these things are recent enough that, even your own fathers and the elder generation among you could tell you.”

God, in the wilderness, “encircled” (NKJV) or “led” (KJV) them (v. 10). The original word can be used of making a circuit or walking around. Note: it is not the term for what God did with cloud and fire. The word means to encircle, to surround, to encompass, or to turn around something. God placed His protective care around this people.

He also “instructed” (NKJV) or “cared for” (NASB) them (v.10). The original word carries the idea of both giving understanding to and caring for another.

He cared for them [him (v. 10)=Jacob (v. 9) put for Jacob’s children (v. 8)] as an eagle does its young (v. 11-12 cf. Ex. 19:4). Matthew Henry, “The eagle is observed to have a strong affection for her young, and to show it, not only as other creatures by protecting and making provisions, but by educating and teaching them to fly. For this purpose she stirs  them out of the nest” (Comments on this verse Volume I, page 674). Jamison-Fausset – Brown commented “This beautiful and expressive metaphor is founded on the extraordinary care and attachment which the female eagle cherishes for her young… she in their attempts at flying supports them on the tips of her wings, encouraging, directing and aiding their feeble efforts. So did God take the most tender, and powerful care of His chosen people” (page 164). A. Clark speaks of the fact that some birds actually bear their young on their backs when the grow weary (volume I, page 827). The New Bible Commentary says, “The parent eagle in teaching her young to fly spreads her wings to prevent them from falling” (page 220).

He also is said to have kept them as “the apple of his eye” (v.10). On the surface one might think this means Israel was a beautiful thing before God’s eye, as an apple is to the human eye. But let’s look closer. The original word means, “the little man of the eye.” The reference is to the reflection seen when one looks closely into another’s eye. The I.S.B.E. says, “The eyeball, or globe of the eye with the pupil in the center, called ‘apple’ from its round shape … the Hebrew … little man referring perhaps specially to the pupil, probably from the little image one sees of himself when looking into another’s pupil” (Volume I, page 209).

Many take this to be a Hebrewism for protection/preciousness (see NASB).   Zondervan’s Pictorial Dictionary, “The eyeball, or the pupil in its center protected by the eyelids automatically closing when anything approaches too near. A symbol of that which is precious and protected” (page 53). Remember as a kid other kids saying, “Made you blink!”? They said this as if not blinking was manliness. Not blinking is actually stupidity. God made the body to so react. They eye is delicate and fragile. The I.S.B.E., “It’s great value and careful protection by the eyelids automatically closing when there is the least possibility of danger made it the emblem of that which is most precious, and jealously protected” (ibid). The NIV Study Bible footnotes read, “Lit. Little man of the eye referring to the pupil a delicate part of the eye that is essential for vision and that therefore must be protected at all cost.”

Others take this to mean that God’s eye was watchful over them. Have you ever notices the reflection of self in another`s eyes? Thus, God was so fixed His attention upon them, that it was as if one could see their reflection in His eye.

Even so today, our God cares for us very much. We are precious to Him (Psalm 116:15; Revelation 14:13; Acts 7:54-56). He knows our tears (Psalm 56:8). One day our tears will be wiped away (Revelation 21:4; Revelation 7:17; 1 Corinthians 15:51-55; 2 Thessalonians 1:6-7).

 Second passage: Proverbs 7:2. The original wording here is the same.

If this is language of protection – then, think of how dearly we that are wise regard our eyesight. We understand how terrible it must be to be blind. We put on goggles, safety glasses, sunglasses, whatever is necessary in protection of our eyes. Even so, should we treasure the word of God, as that which is essential to spiritual sight.

If the language is of having one’s eye upon something – then we’re being told that we should live our lives with our eyes fixed on His law. We should spend a great amount of effort looking upon the word of God. We should seek to direct our lives according to His word.

 Third passage: Psalm 17:8-9. It is thought that David wrote these words as a prayer to God during the time that Saul’s army was chasing after him.

In verse 8, we have the picture of a hen taking care of her chicks. It is similar to Matthew 23:37 (shade, protect from heat, elements).

In verse 8a, the original wording is different, than found in the earlier two passages. The word which appears here means literally, “The daughter of your eye.” But, I do not believe that the meaning has changed at all. This is either a plea for protection (much like verse 8b), or it is saying “let me be precious to you as a daughter is in the eyes of a parent.”

 Fourth passage: Lamentations 2:18-19 (KJV). The original wording is the same as before – daughter of your eye.

It is being used here as simply another term for the eye itself. It is paired with tears. Robert Taylor Jr. writes, “The apple of the eye is to continue its profuse production of tears” (Studies in Jeremiah and Lamentations, Volume II, page 486-487).   Jerusalem had fallen and it was due to their own sins. They brought this suffering upon themselves.

Brethren, we too, need to learn to weep at the miserable mess sin makes of our lives. But, we should not just weep for our sorrow of calamity but we should weep also out of genuine Godly sorrow (2 Corinthians 7:9-10; Matthew 5:4; James 4:8-10). We should weep with regrets of sin and we should amend our ways (Proverbs 28:13; Acts 2:37-38; Acts 8:22; 1 John 1:8-10).

 Fifth passage: Zechariah 2:8b. The actual term here is “gate of the eye.” This is the term for the pupil of the eye for them.

The context concerns the returning remnant from captivity. The message is this – “When you were hurt in going forth into captivity, it was as if someone poked me in the eye” (something painful! It’ll make a grown man cry!). The message is He felt their pain. Note – He is aware of ours as well!

This word picture, “the apple of the eye,” is rich and beneficial in our understanding God’s word. It tells of His treasuring us. It tells also of how we ought to treasure Him and His word. Moreover, it tells how we should be pained over sin. It how He is pained over our sorrows and pains.

Posted in Apologetics, Evidence, Phrase Study, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In The News: Is Divorce Contagious?

CBS reported recently: “Forget about the flu that has been going around – there is something else that is contagious and could put your marriage in jeopardy…  A study from Brown University suggests that divorce is contagious, and the divorce of a friend or loved-one increases your chances of getting divorced, too.  The study conducted in Framingham, Mass., found that 75% of participants were more likely to get divorced if a friend was divorced, and 33% were more likely to end their marriage even if a friend of a friend got divorced.  Researchers called the phenomenon a ‘social contagion’ – the spread of information, attitudes, and behaviors through friends, family and social networks. While psychotherapist Talia Filippelli  does not necessarily agree that divorce itself is contagious, but she said that emotions can be. ‘Emotions are contagious, and if you have somebody really unhappy in their relationship around you all the time, you may start to be critical of your own relationship,’ Filippelli said ” (CBS New York, April 30, 2014).

Who are your friends?   How do they influence you?

1.  Proverbs 13:20 – “He who walks with wise men will be wise. But the companion of fools will be destroyed.”

2.  Proverbs 22:24-25 – “Make no friendship with an angry man, and with a furious man do not go, lest you learn his ways and set a snare for your soul.”

3.  Proverbs 27:17 – “As iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens the countenance of his friends.”

4.  1 Corinthians 15:33 – “Do not be deceived: evil company corrupts good habits.”

 

Posted in Christian Influence, Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Robert Milligan – Concern Over Influence

Robert Milligan(1814-1875) was influential member of the church. He served as co-editor of the Millennial Harbinger with Alexander Campbell and W.K. Pendleton. He penned several great books which are still widely used including, Scheme of Redemption and his commentary – The Epistle to the Hebrews. He was a preacher, and also served as an elder.

He was also a great scholar. He served as a professor at Washington college (Pennsylvania), State University of Indiana, Bethany college (West Virginia), and as President of Kentucky University. He, through the years, taught a variety of subjects including: mathematics, chemistry, natural history, and English literature.

His Concern For Others

Milligan, while a young professor, until the end of his life, was afflicted with severe pain. He suffered from inflammatory rheumatism. Also, he suffered with neuralgia of the brain, which afflicted the optic nerve, and rendered his eyes very sensitive to light. So much were his eyes affected that he often looked down, and not in a person’s eyes, due to the light. As he aged, he frequently relied on others to read to him, in order to spare his eyes from the work.

Brother J.W. McGarvey wrote: “He consulted many eminent physicians in regard to his maladies, and he was repeatedly urged to drink daily a portion of strong whiskey or brandy, with the assurance that it would add at least ten years to his life. But he steadfastly refused to do so, and said that he would rather die ten years earlier than to live by the daily use of intoxicating liquor. And this was not so much because he feared the affects on himself, as because he dreaded the influence it would have on others, and especially the young men, to know that from any cause he kept up such a habit” (Addendum to Milligans’s “The Epistle to the Hebrews,” p. 514). Can you imagine what some students would have thought or been encouraged to do, if they saw Professor Milligan carrying a bottle to his house? He wanted no part of it.

May we each develop that kind of concern over our influence, and for one another. (Note: I am not suggesting that it is necessarily wrong for alcohol to be used for medical reasons, or that Milligan definitely made the the best decission.  But, we should always consider how our actions in all areas might influence others.) Consider the following passages: Matthew 18:6; Romans 14:19, 21; 1 Corinthians 6:12; 8:13; 2 Corinthians 8:21;  Philippians 2:5.

Posted in Christian Influence, drugs, Example, Restoration History, Wine | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Various Instructions for New Converts

The church at Thessalonica had not existed very long when Paul wrote his first letter to them.  He closed the letter with various instructions for these recent converts.  These instructions are valuable for every convert.  Let’s notice…

1.  Comfort and Edify One Another (1 Thessalonians 5:11).

Christians are to help each other stay strong in Christ.  They are to comfort each other when death and other difficulties come (1 Thessalonians 4:18; 5:14).  They are to use their tongues to edify (Ephesians 4:29), and encourage one another on to love and good works (Hebrews 10:24).  “Let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another” (Romans 14:19 cf. 15:1-2).  James Coffman wrote, “The responsibility of Christians is to do, practice, say and engage in only those things that contribute constructively to the building up… of fellow Christians.  It is not enough merely to refrain from saying what will discourage or damage another, or from practicing what will offend another or from doing what may tempt another.  The mandate is to do what will help the spiritual life and growth of fellow Christians” (1 & 2 Thessalonians, 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, p. 61).

2.  Esteem and Love Those Who Labor Among You and Are Over You in the Lord (1 Thessalonians 5:12-13).

It is easy to criticize those who have public roles of leadership.   Some pick to the point of causing some men to want to “throw in the towel.” If this picking is over opinions and non-salvation issues this is a shame.  The Hebrew writer said, “Let them do so (rule – B.H.) with joy and not with grief, for such would be unprofitable to you” (Hebrew 13:17b).

In truth, their hands should be supported (cf. Exodus 17:11-12).  They should be remembered in prayer.  They should be esteemed for their work.  If they rule well, according to the Bible, they should be considered worthy of double honor (1 Timothy 5:17).   “They watch all for your souls, as those who must give account” (Hebrews 13:17).

3.  Be At Peace Among Yourselves (1 Thessalonians 5:13-15).

A lack of peace and harmony in the church is counter-productive.  It will hurt the church’s influence in the city.  It will discourage and not encourage brethren.

We are to be a peaceful people.  Jesus taught, “Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called Sons of God” (Matthew 5:9).  Paul instructed us, “if it is possible as much as depends on you live peaceably will all men” (Romans 12:18).  Again, “We… who are strong ought to bear with the scruples of the weak, and not to please ourselves.  Let each of us please his neighbor for his good, leading to edification” (Romans 15:1-2).  The Hebrews writer said, “Pursue peace with all people, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord” (Hebrews 12:14).

4.  Rejoice and Pray With Thanksgiving (1 Thessalonians 5:16-18).

Affliction and persecution are mentioned five times in Paul’s letters to these Thessalonians (1 Thessalonians 1:6; 3:3; 3:7; 2 Thessalonians 1:4; 1:6).  They faced many trials.

Yet, they were to stay focused on reasons they had to rejoice and be thankful in Christ.  Consider these words: “What is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing?  Is it not even you in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ and His coming?” (1 Thessalonians 2:19);  “The dead in Christ will rise first.  Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.  And thus we shall ever be with the Lord.  Therefore comfort one another with these words” (1 Thessalonians 4:16-18).  “God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, that whether we wake or sleep, we should live with Him.  Therefore, comfort each other and edify one another, just as you also are doing” (1 Thessalonians 5:10-11).  “It is a righteous thing with God… to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels” (2 Thessalonians 1:6-7).

Let us focus on the joy that awaits, and upon God’s goodness to us.  Paul describes these things or “the unsearchable riches of Christ” (Ephesians 3:8). His love is a love “which passes knowledge” (Ephesians 3:19).  “Oh the depth and the riches of God’s saving grace flowing down from the cross for me!  There the debt for my sins by the savior was paid in His suffering on Calvary.  Oh what marvelous mercy, what infinite love!  What immeasurable grace I see!  By His blood I am cleansed; I am happy and free thru His suffering on Calvary!” (Song: Oh the Depth and the Riches by Tillit S. Teddlie).

5.  Quench Not The Spirit (1 Thessalonians 5:19-20).

These words are paralleled with, “Do not despise prophesies.”  Remember that the use of miraculous gifts could be suppressed by the one who possessed such gifts (cf. 2 Timothy 1:6; 1 Corinthians 14:32).  Franklin Camp wrote, “It is a command relative to miraculous gifts” (The Work of the Holy Spirit in Redemption, p. 190).  It may be that some were afraid of boldly proclaiming the message because of the opposition in society, and were not using the God-given abilities which they possessed.

We too can quench the Spirit`s influence and suppress the powerful word of God. We do so by letting fear keep us from proclaiming  the word  to others. We do so when  we will not listen to it ourselves. We do by not using our abilities to His glory.  H. Leo Boles remarked, “Indifference, lukewarmness, and idleness all hinder the work of the Holy Spirit.  To discourage the work of the Lord is to quench the Holy Spirit” (The Holy Spirit: His Personality, Nature, Works, p. 168).

6.  Test All Things (1 Thessalonians 5:21-22).

God’s people are not to be spiritually gullible.  We are to put things to a scriptural test.  The Bereans are commended because, “They received the word with all readiness, and searched the scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).  John warns, “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are from God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1).  Being taught wrong is no excuse.  “If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the ditch” (Matthew 15:14 cf. Genesis 3; 1 Kings 13:11-ff; Colossians 2:8, etc.).

The test is not the end of the matter. Once the testing is completed a decision and response is needed.  If the message is true, receive it and hold fast to it.  If the message is found to be not true, abstain from it.

These are indeed very good words for all of us to ponder.

Posted in Bible Study, christian growth, Elders and Deacons, Fellowship, Holy Spirit, Love, Prayer, Textual study, Unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thought Provoking Stats For Parents and Teens

Here are some stats that I have come across in my reading, and have filed away in my files. If accurate, they are thought-provoking.  I want to share them with you.

1. FATHER IN THE HOME

W. Bradford Wilcox, an assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia, has written an article entitled, “Who’s Your Daddy? There’s more to fatherhood that donating DNA.” He mentioned these stats “one study of 6,403 boys carried out by scholars at Princeton and the University of California at San Francisco found that boys raised in single parent homes are twice as likely as others to end up in prison…

University of Arizona Psychologist, Bruce Ellis, who studied 762 girls in the United States and New Zealand, found that girls who saw their father leave the family before age six were more than six times as likely to have a teenage pregnancy as girls whose fathers stuck around through their entire childhood.

A study of all Swedish children between 1991 and 1998 found that those in single-parent families were twice as likely to attempt suicide and 50% more likely to succeed in committing suicide than children in two-parent families. Pioneering work by Bruce Ellis suggests that the timing of puberty is linked to the presence of a biological father: Girls who grew up without their biological fathers experience puberty (and therefore are more likely to have sex) at a significantly younger age than girls who grew up with their fathers” (The Weekly Standard, Dec. 12, 2005).

Maybe God knew what He was doing when He designed the home as He did, and specified that it is only within marriage that a man and woman are to “know” one another.

2. DATING AGE

Marilyn Morris, founder of an organization on teen abstinence, Aim for Success, has included these statistics in a book she’s written: “91% of all girls who started dating at age 12 have sex before graduation. 56% of all girls who start dating at 13 have sex before graduation. 53% of all girls who start dating at age 14 have sex before graduation. 40% of all girls who start dating at age 15 have sex before graduation. 20% of all girls who started dating at 16 have sex before graduation” (ABC’s of the Birds and the Bees, p. 48 – she borrowed these stats from Josh McDowell’s book, How to Help Your Child say ‘NO’ to Sexual Pressure).

Let’s remember that we are to be about the business of “Train(ing) up a child in the way he should go…” (Proverbs 22:6). Children need restraints. They should not be left to themselves. “A child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame” (Proverbs 29:15).

3. BEHAVIOR CORRELATION

Marilyn Morris also includes these statistics, “Teenage boys who have had sex are: 6 times more likely to drink alcohol than virgin boys; 4 times more likely to smoke cigarettes; 5 times more likely to smoke marijuana; 4 times more likely to use other drugs; 7 times more likely to consider dropping out of school; 3 times more likely to run away from home; 4 times more likely to be arrested by police; 7 times more likely to be suspended from school than virgin teenage boys.

‘Teenage girls who have had sex: 6 times more likely to drink alcohol than virgin teenage girls; 7 times more likely to smoke cigarettes; 10 times more likely to smoke marijuana; 4 times more likely to use other drugs; 4 times more likely to drop out of school; 18 times more likely to run away from home; 9 times more likely to be arrested by police; 5 times more likely to be suspended from school; 6 times more likely to attempt suicide than virgin teen girls.” (ibid, p. 237 – stats taken from “Premature Sexual Activity as an Indicator of Psychosocial Risk, Pediatrics, Feb. 1991).

What I want you to consider is that misbehavior in one area of life is often an indicator of what may be going on in other areas. If your child’s friends have lack of self-control, or a lack of respect for authority in one area of life, likely that is not the only area.

A good parent warns his children about “evil company” (Proverbs 1:10-15; Proverbs 13:20; Proverbs 22:24; 1 Corinthians 15:33). Let us seek each day to “provoke not (our) children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4).

4. BOY FRIEND AGE

“According to a report published by the California Department of Health Services, men 20 years old and older father five times more births among junior high aged girls than do junior high school aged boys. On average, when a 12-year old or younger girl becomes pregnant, the father of the baby averages 22 years of age. When junior high aged girls become pregnant, the fathers of the babies are usually five years older than the mothers.   When high school girls became pregnant, the father averaged nearly four years older” (ABC’s of the Birds and Bees, p. 52 – stats taken from California Vital Statistics – 1992).

Parents, don’t allow your child to get in a situation where they are “unequally yoked.” It is our duty to protect them.

5. TEEN MOM/ SINGLE PARENT

“Fact: About 1 million teenage girls get pregnant each year. That is 1 out of 5 sexually active girls. Pregnancy is the top reason why teenage girls are hospitalized. 7 out of 10 adolescent mothers drop out of high school. When daughters of teen mothers grow up they are 50 percent more likely to have children before they are married.

“When sons of teen mothers grow up, they are 2.7 times more likely to spend time in prison than sons of mothers who delay childbearing until their early 20’s” (ibid, p. 151 – stats from two sources: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, Sex and the American Teenager, p. 41 and Rebecca Maynard’s Kids Having Kids, A Special Report for the Robin Hood Foundation).

“Children of single parents are six times as likely to be poor” (Rush Limbaugh, See, I Told You So, p. 98). “About 50 percent of all unwed mothers go on welfare within one year of the birth of their first child. More than 75 percent go on within five years” (Bill Bennett, The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators, p. 65). William Galson and Elaine Kamarck who served in the Clinton – Gore administration concluded, “The best anti-poverty program for children is a stable, intact family.” (ibid, page 63).

The Bible warns, “the way of the transgressor is hard” (Proverbs 13:15). It also makes clear that the decisions of one generation can effect the next (Genesis 18:19; 1 Kings 15:26; 2 Kings 21:19-21; 2 Chronicles 22:3).

As parents, it is our responsibility to teach our children these things; and to point out (physical difficulties aside), the spiritual consequences to sin (if not repented).

6. UNMARRIED COHABITATION

The world sometimes argues for a “trial marriage.” “Let’s live together for a while and see how it goes,” it’s reasoned.

Marilyn Morris cites three studies on this idea. (1) The first is from the University of Wisconsin. She writes, “sociologists at the University of Wisconsin stated that ‘recent national studies in Canada, Sweden and the U.S. found that cohabitation increased rather than decreased the risk of marital dissolution” (ABC’s p.41 – ref. Elizebeth Thomson and Ugo Colella, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 1992). (2) “Another study documented in the Journal of Marriage and Family stated that the divorce rate is 50% higher among those who lived together before marriage” (ibid, – ref. Larry Bumpass, The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Nov. 1991; 53, 913-928). (3) “An Australian study found that couples who cohabited before marriage were more likely to divorce than those who did not cohabit before marriage. They … ‘separated more often, sought counseling more often, and regarded marriage as a less important part of their lives than those who did not live together before marriage” (ibid – ref. John Cunningham and John Antill, Macquarie University, 1994).

Don’t believe Satan’s lies. God’s ways are always best. Let’s teach our children that “Marriage is honorable in all…” (Heb. 13:4).

Posted in Dating, Ethics, Family, Marriage, Parenting, Stats, suicide | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment