Saints Only Benevolence

Posted on December 12, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

“Some brethren have argued that the church is authorized to help church members and their dependents out of the church treasury, but no others. They reason that many times do we read of the church aiding and assisting “saints,” “disciples,” “brethren” (see Acts 6:1-3; Acts 11:27-29; Romans 15:25; 1 Corinthians 16:1-2; 2 Corinthians 8:1-4; 2 Corinthians 9:1; 1 Timothy 5:3-16; James 2:15-16); however, it is claimed that never do we see an example of the church relieving the non-Christian.

First order of business, where is the consistency? G. K. Wallace remarked, “If it is true that no contribution was made out of the treasury in the New Testament times except to poor saints, it is also true that no contribution was made into the treasury except for poor saints (article – The Church Budget, Gospel Advocate, Jan. 11, 1962). Isn’t it strange that some have no difficulty using money for so many other things out of the treasury? Again, Wallace remarks, “So, if money was put in for the poor saints, certainly, it was taken out for the poor saints. If you want some money in the treasury for the janitor, put some in for the janitor. If you want some money in the treasury to buy fertilizer to put on the lawn, put it in the treasury for that purpose. It always seemed strange to me that brethren could put money into the treasury and take it out to buy a load of fertilizer to put on the lawn, but could not take it out to buy a loaf of bread for a starving baby” (ibid). Some seem to have no difficulty at all using money out of the church treasury for all kinds of things for which there is no Biblical example.

Let us remind ourselves just here that there is a great difference between saying no example and saying no authority. Roy Cogdill recognized this, writing, “Sometimes it is argued that this is the plan (1 Corinthians 16:1-2, B.H.) for raising money only for benevolence in the church. It remains, however, that divine wisdom led Paul to give this plan to Corinth for raising money, and good reasoning will convince one that if it will work in raising money for one righteous cause, it will work for another and for all” (The New Testament church page 105 -106).

Next, is it true that there is no example of the church aiding non-Christians? Read 2 Corinthians 9:13. It speaks of liberal distribution made unto “them” and unto “all.” The “them” clearly refers to the poor saints in Jerusalem. But, to whom does the “all” refer?

Those who hold to the “saints only” position believe that the “all” refers to all other saints in contrast with the saints in need in Jerusalem. Just as the Calvinist limits pantos (translated “every man”) in Hebrews 2:9, even so those who hold to the “saints only” position limit the pantas (translated “all men”) in 2 Corinthians 9:13.

I see no good reason to so limit the wording. (1) Watch the fact that the term “all” is not qualified in any way.  (2) Watch the fact that nothing in the immediate context so limit’s the word. (3) Consider how the unqualified “all” is commonly used elsewhere in scripture: (a) 1 Thessalonians 3:12, “And may the Lord make you increase and abound in love one toward another, and toward all, even as we do toward you.” Does “all” mean just other Christians elsewhere? Or, does it mean just what it says – “all”? (b) 1 Thessalonians 5:15, “See that no one renders evil for evil to anyone, but always pursue what is good both among yourselves, and for all.” Does “all” include the non-Christian here? (c) Galatians 6:10, “As we have opportunity, let us do good to all, especially to those who are of the household of faith.” Clearly, the “all” here is placed in contrast and distinction with “the household of faith.” The reference is to non-Christians. (d) 1 Timothy 4:10, “…we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe. ” Notice that “all” is contrasted with those who believe. It seems to me for anyone to limit the “all” of 2 Corinthians 9:13 there better be a reason which demands such. I see no such demanding reason.

I do believe that our first responsibility is toward the household of faith. However, I see no good reason to deny that the “all” includes the non-Christian.

A parting shot – Matthew 5:46-48 reads, “For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet your brethren only, what do you more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.” Yes, I know that this is written concerning the individual. I understand the point is that we should be kind and loving toward all. However, if the church only shows benevolence towards her own, does such not put her in the same category as the tax collectors? Many denominations do more than this.

Posted in Bible authority, Giving | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Who’s Your Grandfather?

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

The genealogies of Jesus have perplexed some. Was Jesus’ grandfather Jacob (Matthew 1:16) or, Heli (Luke 3:23)? Furthermore, such is not the only difference between Matthew’s record and that of Luke’s.

A careful study of the opening chapters of Matthew and Luke seem to reveal a different focus. Matthew’s focus is on Joseph [1. The angel explains the pregnancy to him (Matthew 1:18-25). 2. He is warned to flee to Egypt (Matthew 2:13-15). 3. He is informed of Herod’s death (Matthew 2: 19-21). 4. He is instructed to go to Nazareth (Matthew 2:22)]. Luke’s focus is on Mary. [1. Gabriel announces the pregnancy to her (Luke 1:26-38). 2. She went to the house of Elizabeth (Luke 1:39-45). 3. She uttered there great words (Luke 1:46-55). 4. She delivered the child (Luke 2:1-7). 5. She ponders the words of the shepherd (Luke 2:8-20). 6. Simeon addressed her (Luke 2:34-35). 7. She spoke with twelve-year-old Jesus (Luke 2:48)]. It seems likely, to me, that the two records show that Jesus was legally (Matthew 1) and biologically (Luke 3) of the seed-line of David.

Another consideration is how repunctuating Luke 3 might resolve the situation. Matthew reads, “Jacob begot Joseph” (Matthew 1:16). Luke reads, “being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, the son of Heli” (Luke 3:23). Robert Gromacki has written—“No parenthesis mark occurred in the original Greek text. Therefore, their placement of the parenthesis marks was arbitrary. Because of the words ‘as was supposed,’ no linguist doubts that a parenthesis was intended. But, what words should be incorporated within the parenthesis? Since the article ‘tou’ does not appear before Joseph (it occurs before every other proper name in the list B.H.), it should read: “being the son (as was supposed of Joseph) of Heli (The Virgin Birth: A Biblical Study of the Deity or Jesus Christ, p. 183).

Jesus was of the correct lineage. “In order for Jesus Christ to be the rightful king of the Jews, He had to be both the physical and the legal son of Abraham and of David, thus making Him the heir to all of the Abrahamic and Davidic covenant promises” (ibid).

It is noteworthy that both records suggest that Joseph was not biologically the father of Jesus. Luke reads, “as was supposed the son of Joseph” (Luke 3:23). Matthew reads, “Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus” (Matthew 1:16). The words “of whom” is feminine gender.

Posted in Apologetics, Jesus | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paradoxical Words

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

Webster defines the word “paradox” to mean “something that is made up of two opposite things that seems impossible but is actually true or possible… a statement that seems to say two opposite things but that may be true” (www.merriam-webster.com). Clinton Lockhart explains that it is “a statement apparently absurd for emphasis” (Principles of Interpretation, p. 179). Terry Hightower explains that a contradiction would be: P is true and P is false in the same respects; while a paradox would be: P is true and P is false in different respects (Shenandoah Lectures, Rightly Dividing The Word, Vol. II, p. 300). Johnny Ramsey used to say that a paradox was “truth standing on its head to gain attention.” The word is from Greek origin: “para” meaning “beyond” and “doxa” meaning “thought.”

Let us consider a few Biblical paradoxes which cry out: “look at me!” “Pause and ponder this!” “Consider closely these words!”

  1. Proverbs 26:4-5, “Do not answer a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.”

Verse four, let me suggest, is a caution about method and tone. We might put it this way, “Do not act like a fool just because another does. Do not lower yourself to his level.” When one becomes loud and angry, we should be very careful that we do not respond in like manner. Consider these passages: Romans 12:21, “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” Ephesians 4:29, “Let no corrupt word proceed out of your mouth, but what is good for necessary edification, that it may impart grace to the hearers.” Colossians 4:6, Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer each one.” Proverbs 15:1, “A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” When answering a fool we should be very careful that we do not conduct ourselves in such a way that onlookers cannot distinguish which is the fool.

Another possibility is that verse four is setting forth a general principle. Ordinarily, it is best to avoid the questions of fools. Consider the following passages: Proverbs 23:9, “Do not speak in the hearing of a fool, for he will despise the wisdom of your words.” Matthew 7:6, “Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.” 2 Timothy 2:23, “But avoid foolish and ignorant disputes…” (cf. Titus 3:9).

Verse five has to do with the answer itself. Sometimes even the fool needs to be answered, “because he or others may think to their own harm that he cannot be answered” (ESV Study Bible). While foolish speech is not to be imitates, the fools own speech should frame the answer. This is what Paul did in showing the implications of what some taught (1 Corinthians 15:12-20). Any doctrine which implies a false doctrine is itself a false doctrine. A wise debater said, “If your opponent is practicing some things that in principle are exactly like the things he opposes, you may charge the inconsistency upon him with the hope of getting him to see the point and abandon his position.”

  1. Mark 8:35, “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel’s will save it” (cf. Matthew 10:39; John 12:25).

The point is: we must be willing to give up (if necessary) our physical lives in service to Christ, if we desire eternal life in heaven. Thomas Warren has written, “What is the point to this paradox? Many people seem to be convinced that preserving their own lives is the greatest privilege – even the greatest responsibility. They hold that while, as the general rule, they may act in an unselfish way, they also hold that ‘when the chips are down’ one will – even must – do anything to save his own life. This view amounts to saying, ‘Everyone should look out for ‘number one’.’ But Jesus taught that pleasing one’s self is not the first obligation of any person. He taught that men must love God (and obey Him) above all else (Matthew 22:37 cf. Deuteronomy 6:5). The second commandment is to love one’s neighbor as himself… one must – in a profound sense – lose sight of himself (as being his only concern) in order to find himself (as being his only concern) in order to find himself (in the eternal purpose of God…) In effect Christ says to each person, ‘Lose your life in Me – become a Christian… and be faithful to Me, even at the cost of your life, and I will give you eternal life’” (Jesus – the Lamb Who is a Lion, pp. 7-9).

  1. Mark 9:35, “If anyone desires to be first, he shall be last of all and servant of all” (cf. Mark 10:42-44; Matthew 20:25-27; 23:11-12; Luke 22:25-26).

Greatness in Jesus’ plan is very different from how the world generally views greatness. Three illustrations are given. (a) It is not uncommon for government leaders to think that true greatness is found in authority. They reason that greatness is found in how many people serve them, and in how many they can order (Matthew 20:25; Mark 10:42; Luke 22:25). (b) It is not uncommon for religious leaders to think that true greatness is found in their positions, titles, and dress (Matthew 23:1-7). (c) It is nearly universally thought that the one who is served food is greater than the one who serves (Luke 22:27). However, in the kingdom of Christ true greatness is found in service. Jesus Himself is our great example. He reminds, “the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28).

  1. Luke 18:14, “I tell you that this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.”

These words close out a parable about self-righteousness (Luke 18:9-14). He who would receive God’s mercy be humble enough to recognize and acknowledge his own short-comings. Someone has said, “The only ones going to heaven will be those who realize that they do not deserve it.” I think this is accurate. We must admit our faults and humbly approach Him for forgiveness. Consider the words of the song Rock of Ages: Nothing in my hand I bring; simply to the cross I cling / naked come to Thee for dress; helpless look to Thee for grace / vile, I to the fountain fly; wash me, Savior, or I die (Song Rock of Ages by A.M. Toplady).

  1. Mark 10:31, “But many who are first will be last, and the last first” (cf. Matthew 19:30).

This seems to be a warning against the pride Peter appears to have possessed (cf. Mark 10:28). The words tie in nicely with the parable which follows in Matthew’s account (cf. Matthew 20:1-16). Coffman’s Commentary quotes Barker who says, “How often do we think that because we are ‘old timers’ in a congregation we have proprietary rights over the program and the property! Everyone has met the superchurchman who lets it be known that ‘I have been coming to this church for years,’ meaning that he has been promoted to Senior Vice President to God, Inc.” (Commenting on Matthew 19:30).

  1. 1 Timothy 5:6, “But she who lives in pleasure is dead while she lives.”

The word translated “pleasure” refers to “riotous living” (cf. Luke 15:13, 30). The one who lives this way is alive physically, but dead spiritually (cf. Ephesians 2:1; 2:5). This one may not realize that she is dead. But, she is and without repentance will remain so through eternity. She is of the walking dead.

  1. John 11:25-26, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die.”

Verse 25: Though, one may physically die before Jesus returns (belief will not prevent such); yet, he shall live in glory. Note: This is speaking of obedient belief (cf. John 5:28-29; 8:51).

Verse 26: If one is physically alive and believing when Jesus returns (some will be, cf. 1 Corinthians 15:51-52; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17), then he shall never see physical death.

Moreover, the faithful will never see death (John 8:51). That is they will never be a part of the second death (Revelation 2:11; 20:1-15).

  1. Revelation 2:9, “I know your… poverty (but you are rich)…” Revelation 3:17, “You say ‘I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing’ – and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked –”

What a contrast! The church in Smyrna was materially poor, but spiritually rich. The church in Laodicea was materially wealthy, but poor spiritually, poor in what counts. Spiritual success cannot be assessed by material success. They are two different things. Material wealth is not inherently good or bad. But it does not last. Let us seek to be rich in what does last. Jim Palmer has written, “How much did Andrew Carnegie, Howard Hughes and William Randolph Hearst leave? How much will Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and you leave? All of it” (Faith and Finance, p. 64).

Posted in Bible Study, Death, Dedication, Hospitality, Humility, Tongue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Only Begotten

Posted on December 5, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

“And the word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

“No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him” (John 1:18).

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son” (John 3:16).

“… he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God” (John 3:18).

“God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him” (1 John 4:9).

The wording is familiar. Five times, in the King James Version, Jesus is referred to as the “only begotten” Son of God. What do these words mean?There is much controversy over the original word “monogeneses.” The first part of the word is without controversy. “Mono” meaning “one” or “only” or “alone”. The second part of the word is the controversial part. Some think that the word is derived from “gennaoo,” meaning “to beget”. Others think that the word is derived from “genos,” meaning “stock” or “kind”.

Those who object to the translation “only begotten,” some times argue: (1) All Christians are begotten of God (1 John 2:29; 3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18). Therefore, Jesus could not be the “only begotten”. Answer—It is the true that all Christians have been “begotten” of God. However, such is a figurative usage of the term. We were not begotten as Jesus was begotten. (2) Isaac is referred to as Abraham’s “only begotten” (Hebrews 11:17). Yet, Isaac was not literally Abraham’s “only begotten,” remember Ishmael? Answer—Isaac was Abraham’s only begotten according to the promise. (3) It is pointed out that while John speaks of Jesus as “only begotten,” Matthew-Mark-Luke speaks of Jesus as the “beloved” son (agapetos) (Matthew 3:17; 17:5; Mark 1:11; 9:7; Luke 3:22; 9:35; 20:13). Thus, the term has nothing to do with His birth. Answer—I do not see these terms as necessarily parallel. Moreover, I do not see how this helps matters, for we too are “beloved of God” (Romans 1:7).

Some suggest that what is actually being taught is that Jesus was a unique, one of a kind son. Hugo McCord’s New Testament renders this “unique son”.

Those who support the rendering “only begotten” point out: (1) The original term is used of those who had only one child (Luke 7:12; 8:41-42; 9:38). Thus, “only begotten” seems the most natural rendering. (2) The original term occurs nine times in the New Testament (Luke 7:12;8:41-42; 9:38; John 1:14; 1:18; 3:16; 3:18; Hebrews 11:17; 1 John 4:9). Three of these times refer to an only begotten child (Luke 7:12; 8:41-42; 9:38). Only one passage on the surface seems a difficulty in so rendering (Hebrews 11:17), and it can be explained. (3) The most reliable translations have rendered it “only begotten” — KJV, NKJV, ASV, NASB. (4) Ancient translations—Robert Taylor, Jr., writes, “In 1879 Murdock gave the English-speaking world what he called ‘a literal translation from the Syriac-Peshito version.’ Only begotten, occurred in John 1:14, 18; 3:16, 18; and 1 John 4:9. Murdock did not vary as much as a particle in dealing with this treasured term” (Studies in John, The 18th Annual Denton Lectures, edited by Dub McClish, p. 616).

It is evident that some translations have missed the mark on the original term. Some have rendered it “only” (RSV, NRSV, ESV), or “one and only” (NIV). These are half translations. They are translating “mono” but leaving “genes” untranslated. It must mean something.

The more I study this, the more I am convinced that the KJV got it correct. However, the Bible, clearly teaches—(1) Jesus was one of a kind. (2) He was (is) the God-Man (John 1:1 cf. 1:14; 17:5; 1 Timothy 3:16). (3) He was supernaturally begotten of God (Matthew 1:20; 1:23).

“Without controversy great is the mystery of godliness:

God was manifested in the flesh,

Justified in the spirit,

Seen by angels,

Preached among the Gentiles,

Believed on in the world,

Received up in glory” (1 Timothy 3:16).

Posted in Jesus, Phrase Study, Word Study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Two Pentecostal Excuses

Posted on December 3, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

Pentecostal preachers claim to be able to work miracles.  However, when one asks to see such, it is not uncommon for excuses to be offered.  Here are two common ones:

1.  It is wrong to seek a sign.

“’Teacher we want to see a sign from You.’  But he answered and said to them, ‘An evil and adulterous generation seek after a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.  For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.’” (Matthew 12:38-40).   Some have used this passage to teach that it is always wrong to ask for a sign and Pentecostal preachers have used this verse to avoid ever giving a sign to anyone who asks.

But, understand that the cases are not congruent. Here’s why: First, Jesus had already worked a sign in their presence (Matthew 12:22-24 cf. Matthew 12:38-40). The same point could be made in other context as well (Matthew 16:1-4 cf. Matthew 15:33-38; John 6:30 cf. John 6:9-13, 24-26).   Second, watch the fact that Jesus did not say, “there will be no sign given” and leave it at that. He said, “no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Jesus, upon that occasion was not going to give them another sign. But, He said in effect, “here is the evidence that I’ll give you – the sign of Jonah.” His resurrection would declare Him to be the Son of God (Romans 1:4).

This passage does not teach that it is wrong to ask for evidence. In truth, the Bible demands that we examine things based upon adequate evidence (1 Thessalonians 5:21; 1 John 4:1; Acts 17:11).

2.  I can’t because of your unbelief.

“Now He did not do many mighty works there because of their unbelief” (Matthew 13:58). Notice that it does not say that, “He did no mighty works there,” but, “He did not many…” Mark’s record supplies us with even more insight saying, “Now he could do no mighty works there, except that He laid His hands on a few sick people and healed them. And He marveled because of their unbelief…” (Mark 6:5-6).

J.W. McGarvey commented on this situation saying, “The statement that ‘he could do there no mighty works’ etc., does not mean that it was physically impossible; for the same power which healed a few could have healed more; but he could not do more because it was improper. When he had wrought a number of miracles without shaking the unbelief of the people, others… would have been worse than useless; to work them therefore, would have been an improper expenditure of time and power.” (Commentary on Matthew and Mark, pages 299-300).

Yes, unbelief may be an excuse for some so-called “miracle healers” today not being able to give any signs. But such is not a Biblical excuse. Jesus did some miracles there. Moreover, on other occasions He likewise did His miracles in the presence of unbelievers (Matthew 9:1-8; Luke 22:50-51; cf. also Acts 2, Acts 13:7-12, etc.).

Matthew 13:58 is used by some today to say, “I can’t do it in your presence because you don’t believe.” Don’t let people use this passage on you this way!

Posted in Miracles, Pentecostalism, Signs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Truth Will Come Out!

Posted on December 2, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

I have read Ann Coulter’s book, “Treason.”  The book is controversial but interesting and thought-provoking.

She revisits the facts concerning Senator Joseph McCarthy.  Most history books for the last 50 years have portrayed the Senator from Wisconsin as a raving lunatic.  But she paints a very different picture.  She indicates that he has been misrepresented for years.  She also defends him.  She writes, “June 11, 1995.  On that day the U.S. government released a cache of Soviet cables that had been decoded during the cold war in a top-secret undertaking known as the Venona Project.  The cable proved the overwhelming truth of McCarthy’s charges Soviet spies in the government were not a figment of right-wing imagination.”

She likewise revisits the Alger Hiss case.  Many have maintained over the years that Richard Nixon was wrong about Alger Hiss.  The high-ranking man in both F.D.R.’s and Truman’s administrations could not be a Soviet spy, could he?  The man who helped create the United Nations, a spy?  Coulter writes, “In 1995, it was no longer uncertain.  That was the year the Venona Project was unveiled, revealing Soviet cables that established that Hiss was a Soviet agent.”

What about Julius and Ethel Rosenberg?  Some have defended them over the years.  Were they really spies?  She refers to Nikita Khrushchev’s memoirs which were published in 1990.  Khrushchev said of the Rosenbergs that they provided “very significant help in accelerating the production of our atomic bomb.”  Moreover, referring to the Venona Project she writes, “The Soviet cables indisputably proved the guilt of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.”  She indicates that J. Edgar Hoover risked acquittal rather than reveal that the U.S. had cracked the Soviet code.”

The Point

Brethren, my point is not to argue history.  However, as I read the book a couple of thoughts went through my mind that I want you to consider.

First, regardless of the truth about Senator Joseph McCarthy, people are misunderstood, and misrepresented, and even lied about in this life.  Sometimes the truth comes out in the life.  Sometimes it does not.  Sometimes it comes out immediately, sometimes 50 years later, sometimes in eternity.  But, the truth will eventually come out (1 Timothy 5:24-25).  We have a redeemer (vindicator) that lives (Job 19:25).

If you try to live for God and proclaim the truth to others, some might write you off as a nut, a radical, a fanatic, an extremist, and the such like.  Take comfort in the fact that one day such mockers will know the truth (Ezekiel 2:5; 33:33).

Second, as to the guilt or innocence of some, things are not always clear in this life.  Sometimes, the evidence is clear.  Sometimes the evidence only becomes known years later.  But, know this, the facts will come out (if one does not meet God’s conditions for pardon) in eternity.  Even secret things cannot be hid (Ecclesiastes 12:14; Romans 2:16; 1 Timothy 5:24-25).  Man may hide things from man, but man  cannot hide things from the all-seeing eyes of God (Proverbs 15:3).

Posted in History, Judgment, Sin | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“…The Temple of the Lord, The Temple of the Lord, The Temple of the Lord…”

Posted on November 28, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

Jeremiah 7:4 says, “Do not trust in these lying words, saying, ‘The temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD are these.'”  What is meant my these words?  What is the warning?

Observe the first words, “Do not trust in these lying words” (Jeremiah 7:4).  Now watch the fact that Jeremiah 7:8-11 begins the same way saying: “Behold, you trust in lying words that cannot profit.  Will you steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, burn incense to Baal, and walk after other gods whom you do not know, and then come and stand before Me in this house which is called by My name, and say, ‘We are delivered to do all these abominations’?  Has this house, which is called by My name, become a den of thieves in your eyes?  Behold, I, even I, have seen it,’ says the LORD.”  See how the nearly same words begins both Jeremiah 7:4 and Jeremiah 7:8-11?

What, therefore is meant by the words, “The temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD…?”  Simply this, God’s people during that time thought that as long as the temple stood, all was okay.  They thought that as long as they came before God at the appointed times to make sacrifice, then all their sins would be ignored.

Let’s fast forward to modern times.  God wants us to be, “doers of the word, and not hearers only” (James 1:22).  Pure and undefiled religion before God includes more than church attendance, and partaking on the Lord’s Supper each fist day.  It includes visiting the “orphans and widows in their trouble” and  keeping oneself “unspotted from the world” (James 1:27).  Let us not be deceived thinking that being at worship services on Sundays, listening to the sermons, partaking of communion, praying, singing, and giving unto the work of the church will cause God to overlook an habitual life of sin.  Worship was never designed for such!

Posted in Faith, Sin, Textual study, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where Are The Nine? (Luke 17:11-19)

Posted on November 26, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

The disease that we call leprosy today (Hansen’s Disease) is a disease of the nerves and of the skin.  “Patients with leprosy experience disfigurement of the skin and bones, twisting of the limbs, and curling of the fingers to form the characteristic claw hand.  Facial changes include thickening of the outer ear and collapsing of the nose.  Tumor like growths called lepromas may form on the skin and in the respiratory tract, and the optic nerve may deteriorate.  The largest number of deformities develop from loss of pain sensation due to nerve damage.  For instance, inattentive patients can pick up a cup of boiling water without flinching… some leprosy patients have had their fingers eaten by rats in their sleep because they were totally unaware of its happening; the lack of pain receptors could not warn them of the danger” (answersingenesis.org).  The disease is spread by skin contact and nasal secretions (ibid).

Was leprosy in the Bible inclusive of Hansen’s Disease?  Possibly.  It certainly was a disease that affected the skin (Leviticus 13:2-8, ff), and it appears contagious (Leviticus 13:46).  However, the Biblical disease may have been used in a much broader sense.  Some think that it may have included numerous diseases including “leprosy, syphilis, smallpox, boils, scabies, fungus infections, all of which are of known contagious potentiality… In addition… molds and fungus growths in houses and cloth (cf. Leviticus 13:47-ff.; 14:33-ff. B.H.)”  (Zondervan’s Pictorial Dictionary, pp. 217-218).

Israelite law required that the leper be quarantined from society (Leviticus 13:46; Numbers 5:23; 2 Kings 15:5).  If the non-infected came near, the law required that the leper cry out, “Unclean!, Unclean!” (Leviticus 13:45). Whatever this disease was, one did not want it.  It was terrible to be diagnosed with leprosy.

Near the end of Jesus’ earthly ministry, Jesus journeyed towards Jerusalem.  He encountered ten lepers who stood afar off.  They lifted up their voices, “Jesus, Master, have mercy on us!”  Jesus instructed them to go show themselves to the priests, which was a requirement of a healed leper before he was reintroduced into society (Leviticus 14:1-2).

The ten lepers went in faith, even before they were healed.  They were healed as they went.  Just one returned to give thanks, and he was a Samaritan (cf. Luke 10:25-37; 17:11-19).  Such displeased Jesus.  He said, “Were there not ten cleansed?  But where are the nine?”

Why did the nine not express their gratitude?  1) Did they want the benefit from Jesus without being identified with Him?  Many “feared the Jews (Jewish leaders – B.H.), for the Jews had agreed already that if anyone confessed that He was the Christ, he would be put out of the Synagogue” (John 9:22; 12:42-43).  2) Did they have a sense of entitlement?  Some do not express gratitude because they think that they are entitled to the benefit.  3) Were they self-centered, thinking of nothing and no one outside of self? Some are takers and not givers. They do not even give “thanks.”  4) Did they think that it was too far, and too much trouble to return to express thanks?

Whatever kept them from expressing thanks, it displeased Jesus. The Holy Spirit included this in scripture for a reason. It must be that this is included to teach us a lesson about expressing thanks.  God wants us to be a thankful people.  A lack of thankfulness is sin (Romans 1:18-21; 2 Timothy 3:1-4).

Here are some questions:

1.  Are you thankful for life itself?

2.  Are you thankful for the forgiveness of sins?  “Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!” (2 Corinthians 9:15).

3.  Are you thankful for your family?

a)  Husbands, are you thankful for your wife and all that she does for you and the        family?

b)  Wives, are you thankful for your husband and all that he does for you and your family?

c)  Parents, are you thankful for your children?  They are a gift from God.

d)  Children, are you thankful for your parents?   Do you appreciate their instruction and guidance, hard work and sacrifice for you?

4.  Are you thankful for true friends? They are there in the good times and in the bad.

5.  Are you thankful for the church?  The assembly ideally is a place which provides strength, encouragement, comfort and knowledge to deal with life.

6.  Are you thankful for those who labor in the Lord?  Bible class teachers, preachers, elders, deacons and others are those who care about your soul.

7.  Are you thankful for this nation?  Yes, it has its flaws, but it still provides us with opportunities and freedom rarely seen in history.

8.  Are you thankful for those who went before and on whose shoulders we stand and still reap benefits?

9.  Are you thankful for the Bible?  God has given us an objective standard by which life should be lived. It gives us clear direction. It is a standard which when followed saves one from many troubles.

10.  Are you thankful for the power and privilege of prayer?  We can approach the throne of grace.

11.  Are you thankful for your job and material possessions?   Or, do you actually believe that no one provided such opportunity but you? Life itself is only possible due to God.

12.  Are you thankful when someone is kind to you?  Do you appreciate such? Or, do you take it for granted.

If you have such thanks, do you express such?

Melinda and I “do not cease to give thanks for you” (Ephesians 1:16).

Posted in Textual study, Thanksgiving | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thanksgiving

Posted on November 24, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

A true Christian should not need the government to set aside one day per year as “Thanksgiving Day” to remember to be thankful. In fact, our lives should exude thankfulness and should be characterized by thanksgiving. 1 Thessalonians 5:18, “In everything give thanks; for this is the will of God…” Colossians 3:15 instructs, “…be  thankful.”

What are some things for which a Christian should be thankful?

  1. We should be thankful for the food we eat (1 Timothy 4:4-5).
  2. We should be thankful for faithful brethren (Ephesians 1:15-16; Philippians 1:38; Colossians 1:3-4; 3:12-15; 1 Thessalonians 1:2-3; 2 Thessalonians 1:3-4; Romans 1:8; 16:3-4; 2 Timothy 1:3-5).
  3. We should be thankful for our families (Psalm 127:3; Proverbs 17:7; 18:22).
  4. We should be thankful for the pattern that God has given us to live within, and by which to conduct our lives (Colossians 2:6-7). This pattern, if followed, will make us better husbands, wives, sons, daughters, neighbors, friends, employers, and employees.
  5. We should be thankful that God has saved us. 1 Corinthians 15:57 reads, “thanks be to God who gives us victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Colossians 1:12-14, “… thanks unto the Father who has qualified us to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light. He has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love, in whom we have redemption through His blood,  the forgiveness of sins.”
  6. We should be thankful for what Jesus has allowed us to become (cf. 1 Timothy 1:12). He   took four fishermen, Peter, James, John and Andrew and made them “fishers of men” (Matthew 4:19). He took Paul, the chief of sinners (1 Timothy 1:15), and transformed him into an apostle. He is not ashamed to call us brethren (Hebrews 2:11)!

Who should be thanked? The answer is God. Consider: 1. It is noteworthy that when Paul considered the good done by brethren, he thanked God (Philippians 1:3-5; 2:13-14; Colossians 1:3-4; 1 Thessalonians 1:2-3; 2:13; 2 Corinthians 9:10-15). This is the case for it is God that motivates man to do the good he does (Philippians 2:13 cf. 1 Thessalonians 2:13; 2 Corinthians 8:16). 2. It is God that should be thanked for our physical blessing, such as our food (1 Timothy 4:4-5; Matthew 15:35 cf. Mark 8:6; Matthew 14:19 cf. Mark 6:41). In fact, we owe Him thanks for our very existence. The Psalmist instructs, “Make a joyful noise unto the LORD all ye lands, Serve the LORD with gladness; come before his presence with singing. Know ye that the LORD he is God; it is He who has made us and not we ourselves; we are His people and the sheep of His pasture” (Psalm 100:1-3). In truth, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning” (James 1:17). 3. Clearly, it is He from whom all spiritual blessings flow. “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who has blessed us with every spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ” (Ephesians 1:3). “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who according to His abundant mercy hath begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you” (1 Peter 1:3-4). Conclusion: It is God, Who should be thanked.

May we always be thankful. As for me and my house, we cease not to be thankful for you!

Posted in holiday, Thanksgiving | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thoughts on Church Growth

Posted on November 21, 2014 by Bryan Hodge

In my personal reading, I’ve found a few thoughts I wish to share with you:

1.  The church needs to be among society.

Alexander Campbell: “That the church may have an influence upon society at large, there is wanting a fuller display of Christian philanthropy… care for the poor… the expression of the most unfeigned sympathy for the distresses of mankind, not only among the brotherhood, but among all men… an ardent zeal for the conversion of sinners. The full display of these attributes is the most effective means of causing to sound abroad, and to achieve new conquests among our fellow citizens.” (The Christian System, page 254).

 Flavil R. Yeakley Jr.: “Someone once said that the way to build a strong church is to find the hurt in a community and heal it. The source of all the hurt, of course is man’s alienation from God. But many people are not interested in being saved. They do not even know that they are lost. However, they do know other hurts: alienation from other people, the break down of the husband-wife relationship, and the alienation of older people from society in general.   We must start with people where they are in order to lead them where they ought to go” (1977, Harding Lectures, p. 262).

Folks, we need to be out in the world (John 17:15-16). We are to be the salt and light of the world (Matthew 5:13-16), the pillar and ground of truth (1 Timothy 3:15), holding forth the word of life (Philippians 2:16). We need to be looking for opportunities to let out lights shine.

2.  Christians need to be involved in one another’s lives.

 Flavil R. Yeakley Jr. cites a survey of new converts who fell away.   He says, “What was counted… was the number of new friends the person had made in the church and the number of former non-Christian friends the person no longer counted as being close friends. The more changes a person had in his friendship pattern the more likely he was to remain a faithful convert. In this study, 100% of the people who had zero, one or two changes in friendship pattern dropped out… three changes 88% (dropped out); four changes 66% (dropped out); five changes 50%; six changes 11%. The drop out rate was zero for those who reported seven or more changes in their friendship patters.” (ibid, p. 349-350).

God’s people should be a part of each others lives (1 Thessalonians 5:14; Hebrews 3:13; Galatians 6:1-2; James 5:20). We should be provoking each other on to “love and good works” (Hebrews 10:24). We should “greet the friends by name” (3 John 14).

An unknown writer has penned these words – “If this is not a place where tears are understood, where do I go to cry? / If this is not a place where my spirit can wing, where do I go to fly? / If this is not a place where my questions can be asked, where do I go to seek? / If this is not a place where my feelings can be heard, where do I go to speak? / If this is not a place where you will accept me as I am, where do I go to be me? / If this is not a place where I can try and fail and learn and grow, where can I be – just me?” ~ Jimmy Jividen, Koinonia, page 119. Fellowship in Christ is helpful to spiritual health. Love should richly flow through the assembly.  “Let all that you do be done with love” (1 Corinthians 16:14). “Let all things be done for edification” (1 Corinthians 14:26).

3.  All member should be included in the work.

Alexander Campbell: “Too long has it been considered the duty, the almost exclusive duty, of the preacher to convert the world… while (others) have only to look on and pray for his success… the work of the Lord will never progress… the regenerating influence of the church will amount to little or nothing – so long as it is thought to be not equally the duty of every member… All are called to labor for the Lord. I hold that every citizen in Christ’s kingdom is bound to take up arms for the King, as much as I am” (The Christian System, p. 254).

It is our duty to “proclaim the praises of Him who  called (us) out of darkness into His marvelous light” (1 Peter 2:9). The early church “went everywhere preaching the Word” (Acts 8:4). There comes a time when we each “ought to be teachers” (Hebrews 5:12). It is unimaginable the results which would be achieved if every child of God took serious their responsiblity to proclaim and teach the Gospel. This is the key to realizing growth potential.

4.  Our giving should be liberal.

V.P. Black wrote a book in 1969 entitled “My God and My Money.” In the book he gives figures from the year 1944 on how much Americans spent on this or that. He records that the sum total of all American giving (in all types of churches) to mission work amounted to only half what they spent on dog food each year. He wrote, “If this does not indicate that the people of America care twice as much for dogs as religious people care for the souls of those outside our own land, what does it prove?”(p. 57).

Again, he wrote, “Money is not filthy lucre. It is not the devil’s coin, it is stored up human power. It is so much of myself which I can keep at work furthering the purposes of my Lord through His church… My money is an indispensable factor in advancing the purpose of my God…” (p. 56)

Folks, let us always keep our treasure in heaven (Matthew 6:21). Let us keep our priorities in order (Matthew 6:33). What we spend our money on may indicate what it is we truly value

Also remember in the work at hand, “He who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he who sows bountifully will also reap bountifully” (2 Corinthians 9:6). How much are we investing into reaching souls?

5.  Money is no substitution for work.

Jerry Jones: “We cannot reach the world with dollars (alone) but with people” (1982 Harding Lectures, p. 58). Sometimes people use their giving to excuse themselves from true involvement.

It takes both. Paul said, “Woe is me if I do not preach the gospel” (1 Corinthians 9:16). The love of Christ should constrain us (2 Corinthians 5:14), also the terror of the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:11).

6.  We need to put into practice what we know.

Carl Mitchell said, “I know of a brother that was asked for the third time to teach a personal evangelism course in the local church. The first evening he went to class and saw the same people who had been there in the prior classes he had taught, so he dismissed the class saying he refused to teach the same people the same thing for the third time! The did not need another class on personal evangelism! The needed to do what they already knew how to do!… When we cooperate with the effort to turn the church inward, we join the force of him who opposes it being turned outward” (ibid, p. 119).

Let us be “doers of the word and not hearers only” (James 1:22).   “Lead me to some soul today/ O teach me Lord just what to say/ Friends of mine are lost in sin/ And cannot find their way/ Few there are who seem to care/ And few there are who pray/ Melt my heart and fill my life/ Give me one soul today (song: Lead Me to Some Soul Today by Wendell P. Loveless).  How long has it been since we taught another the Gospel?

 

Posted in Christian Influence, Chruch, Fellowship, Giving, Soul Winning, Work | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment