Holy Spirit: Sealed/Guaranteed

Posted on June 11, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

The Bible speaks of those who were sealed with the Spirit, and who had been given the earnest (or guarantee) of the Spirit. How should these words be understood?

Sealed

John 6:27, “Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give you, because the Father has set His seal on Him.”

A seal can refer to a visible stamp or marking on a document. It authenticates or confirms a document to be genuine.

God set His seal on Jesus. The signs Jesus did authenticated that His message was from God (cf. John 3:2). Sadly, some cared more about the loaves and the fish, than what the message was (John 6:26).

2 Corinthians 1:21-22, “Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has anointed us is God, who has also sealed us…”

Watch the pronouns. “Us” refers to Paul and his co-workers (2 Corinthians 1:1, 6, 8, 19, 21). “You” refers to the saints at Corinth and Achaia (2 Corinthians 1:1).

God established Paul and his co-workers to the Corinthians. This word “establishes” could be rendered “confirms.” The reference is to miraculous confirmation (cf. Mark 16:20; Hebrews 2:3).

God anointed Paul and his co-workers. The reference is to miraculous anointing (cf. Acts 10:38).

God sealed Paul and his co-workers. God authenticated their message, as being from God.

Ephesians 1:13, “In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise.”

Watch the sequence. First, they heard. Second, they believed. Third, they were sealed with the Holy Spirit.

Acts mentions the conversion of some at Ephesus. The same sequence appears. First, they heard (Acts 19:4-5). Second, they believed enough to be baptized (Acts 19:5). Third, they received miraculous abilities (Acts 19:6).

Acts mentions the conversions of some at Samaria. Again, the same sequence appears. First, they heard (Acts 8:5, 12). Second, they believed and were baptized (Acts 8:12). Third, they received the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:14-17).

This same sequence is seen in the Great Commission. First the gospel was to be preached (Mark 16:15). Second, it is to be believed and baptism is to follow (Mark 16:16). Third, signs would follow (Mark 16:17).

Franklin Camp commented, “Christ was sealed by the Spirit to confirm Him as God’s Son and to certify Him as the promised Messiah of the Old Testament. The apostles were sealed by the Spirit to confirm and to certify them as ambassadors of Christ. The seal on the Ephesians was the manifestations of the Spirit that confirmed them as God’s people” (Camp, The Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 175).

Ephesians 4:30, “And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.”

The Holy Spirit is grieved when man lives sinfully (see: Seven Signs Against the Spirit).

Franklin Camp commented on their sealing. He said, “Read Ephesians 4:7-16. Here are ten verses, and all of these verses are dealing with miraculous gifts… suppose that verse 30 is read immediately following verse 16. Would anyone have a problem in seeing that the sealing was in connection with miraculous gifts? Ephesians 4:30 is in the same chapter and context that discusses miraculous gifts” (Camp, The Work of the Holy Spirit in Redemption, p. 177).

What about the words “for the day of redemption?” The word “for” (eis) tells us that the aim of the sealing is the day of redemption. It is akin to 1 Corinthians 1:7-8, which reads “so that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, who will also confirm you to the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Guarantee

2 Corinthians 1:21-22, “Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has sealed us and given us the spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.”

Again, watch the pronoun. “Us” refers to Paul and his co-workers (2 Corinthians 1:1, 6, 8, 19, 21). “You” refers to the saints at Corinth and Achaia (2 Corinthians 1:1).

Paul and his co-workers had been anointed and sealed by God in order to establish (or confirm) to others (such as those at Corinth) that their message was from God. The words “anointed” and “sealed” are references to miraculous gifts. The giving of the Spirit as a guarantee should be understood in this context.

2 Corinthians 5:5-7, “Now… God… has given us the spirit as a Guarantee. So we are always confident knowing that while at home in the body we are absent from the Lord. For we walk by faith, not by sight.”

The “us” and “we,” in context, refers to Paul and his co-workers (2 Corinthians 3:1; 4:1, 5, 13-15; 5:1, 13, 18-20). Though, there is an application to all Christians (cf. 2 Timothy 4:8).

God is gracious. (1) He has prepared for the faithful a glorious, eternal habitation (2 Corinthians 4:16 – 5:2 cf. 5:5a). (2) He also provided the confidence in Paul, and others, of the things not seen. One of the ways that He did so was by giving the Spirit. Franklin Camp commented, “The word ‘sealed’ and the word ‘earnest’ are simply two different words expressing the same thought by two different figures of speech… The ‘seal’ of the Holy Spirit was the miraculous manifestations of the spirit that certified and guaranteed the integrity of the revelation given and obeyed. The ‘earnest’ of the spirit is the figurative term to indicate the inward enjoyment of the blessings of Christianity, because of the assurance given by miraculous manifestation. How could one enjoy the blessings of Christianity unless he was assured of the truthfulness of the gospel he had received?” (Camp, The Work of The Holy Spirit in Redemption, p.p. 181-182).

Ephesians 1:13-14, “…You were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee (earnest KJV) of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.”

Some have thought that the “earnest” (KJV) means down payment. However, such is not the meaning (Genesis 38:17, 18, 20 LXX). “Originally, earnest money deposited by the purchaser and forfeited if the purchase was not completed… In general, usage, it came to denote a pledge, or earnest of any sort” (Vine’s). The word refers to a pledge or a guarantee.

They had a miraculous guarantee. Foy Wallace, Jr. commented, “The Ephesian Gentiles were among them that were afar off in the heathen world and that Holy Spirit of promise was to them the seal and assurance of their inheritance in the gospel of their salvation revealed to them through the Word of Truth” (Wallace, The Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit, p. 80).

They had the guarantee of God’s word. There is a textual variant in Ephesians 1:14. Some manuscripts have a masculine pronoun, others have a neuter pronoun. If the pronoun is masculine, then the antecedent is not “Spirit” but “word.” Marion Fox renders Ephesians 1:13-14 this way – “by (or in) whom you also (were made a heritage v. 13 cf. v. 11), after having heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, [by (or in) whom after having believed, you were sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise,] which (word) is the earnest of our inheritance, unto the redemption of the possession, unto the praise of His glory” (Fox, The Work of the Holy Spirit, Vol. 1, p, 223). He believes that the guarantee to be God’s word on the matter (cf. John 10:35b; 2 Timothy 2:13; Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:13-20).

This is an interesting theory. However, the term “guarantee” or “earnest” two other times is connected with the Spirit (2 Corinthians 1:22; 5:5). I see no necessary reason not to understand it the same way in this passage.

This guarantee was “until the redemption of the purchased possession.” The purchased possession refers to the church (Acts 20:28) or Christians (1 Corinthians 6:20; Titus 2:13-14; 1 Peter 1:18-19). The redemption refers to eternal redemption (Romans 8:18-25 cf. Titus 1:2). The word “until” is eis. The N.A.S.B. renders it “with a view to the redemption.”

Today, we do have the assurance of His word (John 10:35b; 2 Timothy 2:13; Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:13-20). We have the internal evidence of the written word (Hebrews 11:1 cf. Romans 10:17; John 20:30-31).

Posted in calvinism, Holy Spirit, Jesus, Miracles, Phrase Study, Signs, Textual study, Word Study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

3 Corinthians, Laodiceans, and 3 Peter

Posted on June 10, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

Some have worried themselves over whether there are some books missing from the New Testament canon. Three books in particular have been called into question.

A Previous Epistle

In 1 Corinthians 5:9 Paul writes, “I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people.” Some believe this verse is an illusion to a previous epistle that Paul had written to these brethren, which we no longer have. Does this refer to a missing New Testament book? Should there be a 1st Corinthians, 2nd Corinthians and a 3rd Corinthians? Should 1st Corinthians be titled 2nd Corinthians and 2nd Corinthians be titled 3rd Corinthians?

I see no reason for such conclusions. It seems to me that the reference is to this very book of 1st Corinthians. This may be an Epistolary Aorist much as John used in 1 John 2:12-14. That is Paul says, “I wrote” (past tense) because Paul is putting it from the reader’s perspective.

If I wrote a letter to someone and in it said, “While I am out-of-town feed my dog after you get off work everyday” and later in the same letter went on to say, “I wrote to you about feeding my dog after you get off work each day – let me explain to you more fully about what I want you to do.” One would not conclude that I was referring to a previous letter, would he? Paul is doing the same thing.

Watch the context. Paul had just told these brethren to withdraw from a brother who was engaged in a life of fornication (1 Corinthians 5:1-8). Now, he is simply cautioning them not to think that he means that it is their duty to withdraw themselves from everybody in the world that lived such a sinful life (1 Corinthians 5:9-13). Adam Clark agrees writing, “The wisest and best skilled in Biblical criticism agree that the apostle does not refer to any other epistle than this; and that he speaks here of some general directions which he had given in the foregoing part of it…”

The Epistle of Laodicea?

In Colossians 4:16 Paul writes, “Now when this epistles is read among you, see that it is read also in the church of the Laodiceans, and that you likewise read the epistle from Laodicea.”

Again, some believe that this verse is an allusion to an inspired epistle probably written by Paul, that is now lost. But is such the case?

Consider these things: (1) The text does not actually call it, “the Laodicean epistle,” or “The epistle of Laodicea,” but “the epistle from Laodicea.”   Such is a big difference. The epistles were circulated (Colossians 4:16; 2 Peter 3:15-16; 2 Corinthians 1:1; Revelation 1:11). It is conceivable that the epistle in question was not originally written to Laodicea, but they were now in possession of it, and were to pass it next to the church at Colossae. (2) The cities of Laodicea and Colossae were neighboring cities. They were located just a short distance apart. Foy Wallace, Jr. even gives reason to conclude that the churches in these two cities merged at a later time (The book of Revelation, page. 36). (3) The themes of the books of Ephesians and Colossians complement one another well. The book of Ephesians emphasized the place of the church in God’s plan. The book of Colossians emphasizes the Christ in God’s plan. It would be natural to read these two books one after the other. Moreover, it is clear that these two books were written about the same time. (4) Adam Clark says, “Marcion… of the second century, as quoted by Tertullian… in the beginning of the third century calls it (the book of Ephesians – B.H.) the epistle to the Laodiceans.” Besides this, there is not reference to a Laodicean epistle in the early church. Geisler and Nix’s, “A General Introduction to the Bible,” concludes, The Laodicean letter is probably the canonical book of Ephesians” (page 26).

Another Epistle of Peter?

2 Peter 3:1 – “This second epistle, beloved I now write to you in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance.”

Some have denied that the mentioning of this epistle as being a second epistle, means that  what we call 1 Peter was the other epistle. Some think that Peter wrote another letter that is now missing. The main reason that they do so is because it is thought that 2 Peter addresses itself to a totally different concern than that of 1 Peter. Yet, 2 Peter 3:1 speaks of a similar purpose. Thus, there must be a missing epistle.

Ridiculous! While it is true that the theme is somewhat different, still there is a similarity between the two epistles. Both epistles speak of Noah and the flood to teach us today (1 Peter 3:20-21; cf. 2 Peter 3:1-7). Such is the reference in 2 Peter 3:1. Add to this, both epistles speak of the need to grow (1 Peter 2:1-2 cf. 2 Peter 1:5-7 and 2 Peter 3:18). Additionally, both were written to affect the mind (1 Peter 1:13, 3:8; 4:1; 5:2 cf. 2 Peter 3:1-2).

There simply is no necessary reason to conclude that this refers to some missing book. Where is the evidence of this missing book? Where does the early church ever allude to such? Moreover, would one, just by reading 2 Peter 3:1, even think there to be a lost book?

Conclusion

Put your mind at ease. God has promised to preserve His words (Matthew 5:18; Matthew 24:35; Luke 16:17). Geisler and Nix wrote, “It seems highly unlikely that God would have inspired a book that He did not preserve” (page 217). Moreover there is no evidence which warrants the conclusion that any books are missing.

Posted in Apologetics, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I Want The Goat to Die!

Posted on June 4, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

“There is an old Russian fable, with different versions in other countries, about two poor peasants, Ivan and Boris. The only difference between them was that Boris had a goat and Ivan didn’t. One day, Ivan came upon a strange-looking lamp and, when he rubbed it, a genie appeared. She told him that she could grant him just one wish, but it could be anything in the world. Ivan said, ‘I want Boris’ goat to die.’ Variations on this story in other countries suggest that this tells us something about human beings, not just Russians.” (Thomas Sowell Reader, p. 129).

This attitude has been manifested through history. Solomon once heard a maternity case involving two women. These women were harlots. The shared the same house. They both had given birth to a child near the same time. One child died, due to the mother’s carelessness. Now, both women claimed to be the mother of the living child. Solomon said, “Bring me a sword… divide the living child in two, and give half to one, and half to the other” (1 Kings 3:24-25). The true mother said, “O my lord give her the living child, but by no means kill him!” (1 Kings 3:26). The woman who falsely claimed maternity said, “Let him be neither mine nor yours, but divide him” (1 Kings 3:26). She did not really want the child. She simply did not want the other woman to have a child. Solomon rendered his verdict. He said, “Give the first woman the living child, and by no means kill him; She is his mother” (1 Kings 3:27).

Envy is a work of the flesh (Galatians 5:19-21). “Those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God” (Galatians 5:21). “If you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. This wisdom does not descend from above, but is earthly, sensual, demonic” (James 3:14-15). We must rid ourselves of envy.

We should love and care about others. “Rejoice with those who rejoice, and weep with those who weep” (Romans 12:15). It should not make us feel bad when another has joy in his life.

Envy often is over material possessions. However, it should be remembered that those who are right with God are rich. “Let the lowly brother glory in his exaltation” (James 1:9). “Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in the faith and heirs of the kingdom to those who love Him?” (James 2:5). “Do not let your heart envy sinners, but be zealous for the fear of the LORD all the day; for surely there is a hereafter, and your hope will not be cut off” (Proverbs 23:17-18 cf. Proverbs 24:19-20; Psalm 37; 73).

Posted in animals, envy, Wealth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Holy Spirit: In Sanctification (Part 4)

Posted on June 2, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

The Bible clearly teaches that God sanctifies. Moreover, it teaches that He does so indirectly, by medium of the word (John 17:17, 19). However, some believe that He also directly (miraculously) influences the heart and mind of man. Some believe that this influence is irresistible.

Let’s consider a few passages which are commonly cited…

God Works in You

Philippians 2:12-13, “…Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; for it is God who works in you both to will and to do His good pleasure…”

Work out your own salvation. “Work out” is present tense (continue to work out), middle voice (This is something that you are to do. It is not something done for you. Man is not passive in this matter), imperative mood (This is a command). Not all works are excluded from salvation. Meritorious works are excluded (Romans 4:4; Titus 3:4-5). Works of the Old Testament law are excluded for us (Galatians 2:21; 3:2; Romans 3:20, etc.). Man-made works of righteousness are excluded (Romans 10:1-3). Man is not saved by works of flawless, sinless perfection which needs no grace, mercy, or forgiveness (Romans 3:23 cf. 4:4-8). However, there are works which God requires of man (John 6:27-29; Acts 10:34-35; Philippians 2:12; James 2:24 26).

Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. That is, be serious and conscientious about the Christian life. Fear being lost (Hebrews 10:31). Fear (respect) God (Psalms 111:10; Proverbs 1:7; 3:7; 9:10; 15:33; Isaiah 8:12-13 cf. 1 Peter 3:15; Matthew 10:28). Do not take your duties and responsibilities lightly.

It is God who works in you both to will and to do His good pleasure. This is a caution. Man should not be arrogant or puffed up over his work in the Lord, for credit really belongs to God. It is He, who produces the desire and activity in man.

The fact that God works in man is stated, but the “how” is not explained here. Some have read into this a direct operation of God on the heart and mind of man. Is such demanded by the text?

We know that God works in man through the medium of the word (1 Thessalonians 2:13). Steven Lloyd linked Philippians 2:12-13 with 1 Thessalonians 2:13. He wrote, “How is it that God works in us? …It is God’s word that effectively works in us and motivates us to do His will” (Lloyd, Coping: A Biblical Approach, pp. 64-65). J.W. McGarvey provides this bit of wisdom, “When an effect can be explained and accounted for by causes which are known to be present, it is illogical to assume a cause which is not known to be present” (McGarvey, Original Commentary on Acts, p. 203).

Led by the Spirit

Galatians 5:16-18, “Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh, and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things you wish. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.”

Some were still carnally-minded (Galatians 5:17 cf. Romans 8:6-7), and double-minded (cf. James 4:4, 8). They had not yet crucified the sinful passions of the flesh (cf. Galatians 2:20; 5:24; 6:14). They were trying to serve two masters. Such will not work.

Paul commanded them to walk in the Spirit (Galatians 5:16). This is in the imperative mood (It is a command). He is instructing them to conduct their lives according to the teaching of the Spirit. There is not one item listed as “The Fruit of the Spirit” (Galatians 5:22) which is not taught in the Scriptures, and it is the Spirit which revealed this teaching.

If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. Howard Winters commented, “To walk in the Spirit and to be led by the Spirit embrace the same concept. They both mean to be directed by the Spirit (and the Spirit’s direction today comes through the word of God, divine revelation) or to live for spiritual things. Spirituality is not just a single characteristic; it is a total outlook of life – what one is and how he lives, the totality of living by the things of the Spirit” (Winters, The Work of the Holy Spirit, pp. 191-192). The term “led” in no way implies a direct operation of the Holy Spirit, or an irresistible force (cf. 1 Corinthians 12:2; 2 Timothy 3:7). Remember that to walk in the Spirit is a command.

What is meant by “you are not under the law”? It is an ellipsis, meaning – “You are not under the condemnation of law” (cf. Romans 8:1; Galatians 5:23). It certainly does not mean than man is not amenable to law. If he is not amenable to law, then there could be no sin (Romans 4:15; 5:13; 1 John 3:4). Clearly, we sin (1 John 1:8). Moreover, many passages speak of our being under some law (Isaiah 2:3; Micah 4:2; Jeremiah 31:33-34 cf. Hebrews 8:10-11 and 10:16; Galatians 6:2; Romans 8:2, 7; 13:8-10; 1 Corinthians 9:21; Hebrews 10:16; James 1:25; 2:12).

Enlightenment

Ephesians 1:15-20, “…I do not cease to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers: that God… may give you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him, the eyes of your understanding being enlightened: that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, and what is the exceeding greatness of His power toward us who believe…”

Revelation was still occurring. “The Spirit of wisdom and revelation” refers to revelation through inspiration (cf. Exodus 28:3; Deuteronomy 34:9; Isaiah 11:2). The “knowledge” (epignosis) refers to greater, deeper knowledge. “This word translated “knowledge” (epignosis) goes beyond the ordinary word for knowledge (gnosis). Whereas the latter might simply indicate a knowledge of facts, the word Paul used indicates a full, complete and thorough knowledge” (Gary Workman, Paul’s Prayer, Spiritual Sword Lectureship: The Book of Ephesians, p. 18). It refers to “greater and more accurate knowledge… deeper and more intimate knowledge and acquaintance… the complete comprehension after first knowledge (gnosis) of a matter. It is bringing me better acquainted with a thing I knew before; a more exact view of an object that I saw before afar off” (Trench, p, 300 quoted by Marion Fox in the Work of the Holy Spirit, Vol. 2, p. 151). He wanted them to receive through inspiration a greater knowledge and appreciation of what God has planned for the saints.

How does God enlighten the eyes? The Bible teaches that He does so through the medium of His revealed word (cf. Psalm 19:7-8; Acts 26:16, 18). Where is the passage which clearly teaches that He enlightens any other way?

Strengthen With Might

Ephesians 3:14-16, “For this reason I bow my knees to the Father… that He would grant you… to be strengthened with might through His spirit in the inner man.”

Paul prayed that they be strengthened. This strengthening would be done by (dia, the means or instrument by which such would be accomplished) the Spirit. The effect would be in (eis, into) the inner man. Wayne Price has written, “Some would have the proposition ‘eis’ pale into nothing more than ‘in’ showing location. In their judgment, this verse informs us that the Holy Spirit is ‘in’ the inner man. This verse does not even address the issue of the Spirit’s indwelling whatsoever. Instead, it merely tells us that the Holy Spirit imparts a strengthening directed toward the inner man” (Price, The Spirit in the Inner Man, Hammer and Tongs, September – December 1997, p. 5).

The passage does not specify how the Holy Spirit strengthens. However, the Bible clearly teaches that man may be strengthened by medium of God’s revealed word (Acts 14:21-22; 15:40-41; 16:4-5; 18:23; 20:32; 1 Thessalonians 3:1-2).

Revelation was still coming forth at the time Paul wrote this epistle to the saints at Ephesus (Ephesians 4:7-13). The Holy Spirit inspired the apostles and prophets to reveal the message of God (Ephesians 2:18, 20; 3:1-7). Foy Wallace, Jr. commented, “All gifts in the church with which they were endowed were to enable them (to) inwardly grow… as mentioned in chapter 4:8-16” (Wallace, Commentary on Romans, Galatians, and Ephesians, p. 171).

One of the goals of Paul’s prayer was “that Christ may dwell in your hearts through (dia) faith” (Ephesians 3:17); or more literally through “the faith.” This likely refers to the system of faith, the New Testament. However, even if it refers to personal faith, it cannot be separated from God’s word, for “faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God” (Romans 10:17). There seems no good reason to conclude that the Holy Spirit strengthens the inner man separate and apart from the medium of the word.

However, whatever one’s views – one thing should be very clearly emphasized. The Holy Spirit does not sanctify man with irresistible force (1 Thessalonians 4:1-8).

Posted in calvinism, christian growth, Holy Spirit, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

An Ancient Earth? (Assumptions, Assumptions!)

Posted on June 1, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

Those of the evolutionary persuasion adamantly teach us that this earth is old, very old. In fact, they tell us that this earth is perhaps, and in all likelihood, as old as 4.6 billion years. They teach this as fact. They teach this with great arrogance and haughtiness. Anyone, who doesn’t understand that this earth is ancient is looked down upon as being woefully ignorant. After all, “science” is upon their side. They have Carbon-14 and other radiometric dating techniques which prove these things!

On the other side are the Bible believing theists. They have studied. They know that it is impossible to cram 4.6 million years of time into the Biblical record. They believe that the Bible means what it says: God created the heavens, and the earth, the sea and all that in them is, in six literal, twenty-four hour days (Exodus 20:11). They, furthermore, recognize there to be a vast difference between any genealogical gaps that might exist in the Biblical record, and chronological gaps. To them, the earth is young, just a few thousand years old.

Why all the fuss? I believe this to be an important discussion for each side, for a few reasons. (1) This discussion is important for the evolutionary “scientist” and atheists, because: (a) Even though, macro-evolution is not observable (that by definition places it outside of the realm of science), it is thought that if they can convince you of an old earth, then they can convince you that given enough vast amounts of time, anything is possible, even evolution [Such reasoning is faulty; For example, given enough time (opportunity) would a hurricane ever blow enough scrap metal together in an organized fashion so as to form from scrap one fully functional 747 jumbo jet? Of course, such is preposterous!]. This argument is persuasive to many. (b) It is a way to attack the Bible, and reduce it, in the minds of men, to mere mythology. Who are our children going to listen to: the preacher, parents, Bible class teachers with a 2000 year old book; or modern “science” with its radiometric dating methods? Alas, many are listening to the latter. And yes, many are smart enough to understand that the two can’t be harmonized. If modern “science” and its ancient earth, and evolutionary teachings are right, then the Bible is wrong with this regard to its Genesis account. Moreover, since so much of the Bible’s teaching is based upon the Genesis record [e.g, Creation (Hebrews 11:3); Marriage (Matthew 19:1-6); Role of men and women (1 Corinthians 11:8-9; 1 Timothy 2:12-14) Origin of sin (Romans 5:12),etc.], it cannot be trusted on anything. (2) This is important for the Bible believer, because: (a) The credibility of the Bible is being called into question. (b) Our children are being taught this, and yet we know that such is contrary to the Biblical record. How are we going to answer them? (c) Many have felt compelled in the church to compromise the Genesis record of creation.  If we do so, can we really trust the rest of the Bible? If the Bible does not mean what it says here, then how do we know what it means – anywhere?

The real question is this: Has science really proven an ancient earth?

The answer is: no, they have not. All radiometric dating methods are based upon certain (non-provable) assumption. First, they assume that originally this earth was entirely composed of parent elements, and no daughter elements. That is, when measuring age it is understood that certain elements, over time, will break down (or decay) into certain other daughter elements. For instance, Uranium 238 decays over time into Lead 206. When examining a rock, they look at the ratio of these two elements contained in that rock, and they assume that originally that there was no Lead 206 but that all of that Lead 206 came from Uranium 238. They then figure how long it would take for that Uranium to convert into the present amount of Lead, and from this process is deduced the age of that rock. But notice, it is based upon a very large (and unprovable) assumption that there was no original daughter elements present. How do they know this to be the case? The answer is that they do not know this to be the case. Watch the words of the Encyclopedia Britannica, “A second important assumption is that a sample began its life free of daughter atoms. If that were not so, there would be the appearance of a certain age even at the time of zero. At a later time such a ‘built-in’ age would be the error inherent in a measured age. This second assumption is never valid in the strictest sense, and there are some cases in which it is not even valid practically.”1 Consider this: Couldn’t God have originally created the earth with all elements present, from the very beginning, placed here for man’s benefit? Of course He could!   And, if He did so would the earth have an appearance of age?   Yes, just as Adam and Eve had an appearance of age from time zero, being made adults, and not as infants. Second, these dating methods assume an uniformitarian geological model. For example, they assume a standard erosion rate. They assume that coal, oil, and natural gas are formed at the same rate today, as always. They assume things that cannot be proven. But what if this world hasn’t been so uniformed in its geological earth history? What if there was, as the Bible indicates, a global catastrophe, a great deluge which covered deeply this entire earth? What would such do to the appearance of things? “Modern geology holds that wind and water erosion has been a rather constant process for millions of years. Therefore, all rock strata have been formed by this slow, gradual process of water exerting a few pounds of pressure each year to compress small fragments of earth into large bed rock. Think how utterly upset that theory would be by the catastrophe of a universal flood. Since Mt. Ararat is 17,000 feet high and the Water was at least this deep, and since a cubit foot of water weighs about 63 pounds, every square foot of the earth’s surface at sea level had a pressure of 1,071,000 pounds. This is equivalent to about 107 billion pounds of pressure on top of the average house. Industrial diamonds are made from carbon compounds by exerting a pressure of 800,000 pounds per square inch for a few minutes. One can readily see how such a flood, exerting great pressure for more than six months over the whole face of the earth, could have formed coal beds, sedimentary rocks, diamonds, mountains, valleys and hundreds of other phenomena. One great catastrophe could have accomplished in a few months what it would take uniformity millions of years to accomplish.”2

Much more time and space could be given to this important subject; However, these two points along should help dispel the notion that science has proven an ancient earth. Their conclusions are based upon assumptions, and assumptions. Add to this fact that numerous are the methods that point to a relatively young earth, yet our children never hear about these. Parents, arm yourselves with the facts3 and don’t back down to these “pseudo-intellectuals.”

ENDNOTES

  1. Encyclopedia Britannica, Articles “Dating, Relative and Absolute,” Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropaedia Vol. 5 page 504-505 (1979).
  2. Furman Kearley, Tract: “The Significance of the Genesis Flood: (World Mission Publishing Company, Lubbock TX, 1974). Page 11-12. Note: Nothing demands that the mountains were once so high. See Psalm 104:6-9 N.A.S.B.
  3. If one wants more information in this area, one should subscribe to Apologetics Press’ publication Reason and Revelation or Focus Press’ Think..
Posted in Apologetics, Evidence, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Holy Spirit: In Sanctification (Part 3)

Posted on May 27, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

The Bible clearly teaches that God sanctifies. Moreover, it clearly teaches that He does so indirectly, mediately through the word of God (John 17:17). He does so indirectly through the influence of the word of God. However, some believe that the Bible also teaches that He does so directly and immediately. That is, it is thought that He directly influences the human heart without means of the word, or separate from the word.

Let’s consider two commonly cited passages…

Love Poured Out

Romans 5:5, “Now hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us.”

First issue: What love is in view? Does this refer to our love for God? Does it refer to our love for others, as God loves others? Or, does this refer to God’s love for us? The context suggests that the reference is to God’s love for us (cf. Romans 5:8). We can have confidence that God will not let us down, because He has revealed His love for us.

Second issue: How did God pour out this love into our hearts? Roy Deaver commented, “The knowledge we have of God’s love is the result of the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit by revelation, by miracles, and by spiritual gifts, made known God’s love” (Deaver, Romans: God’s Plan for Man’s Righteousness, pp. 137-138). The pouring out of the Spirit takes one back to the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:17-18, 33, 36-38). It refers to revelation and confirmation which came by the Holy Spirit.

This does not teach what some think. It does not teach that the Holy Spirit directly (miraculously) transforms the hearts of men into loving hearts, or at least provides direct influence on the heart towards such.

Natural Man v. Spiritual Man

1 Corinthians 2:14-16, “The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is rightly judged by no one. For ‘who has known the mind of the LORD that he may instruct Him?’ But we have the mind of Christ.”

Some have misunderstood this passage. It is thought that the natural man is the non-Christian, or the unsanctified. Furthermore, it is thought that the spiritual man is the Christian, or sanctified man. Then, it is inferred that this is teaching that the natural man, who is without aid of the Holy Spirit, cannot properly interpret scripture The spiritual man, aided by the Holy Spirit, can accurately interpret scripture.

However, the context is not interpretation, but revelation. Let’s notice the context: (1) Verses 7-9. God, before time, ordained a plan for our glory (1 Corinthians 2:7 cf. Philippians 3:20-21; Colossians 3:4; 2 Thessalonians 2:14). Man, apart from revelation, did not understand God’s plan. It was hidden wisdom. This hidden wisdom was now being revealed by inspired men (1 Corinthians 2:7 cf. Ephesians 3:1-5; Romans 16:25-26). (2) Verses 10-13. This declares how God chose to reveal His plan. No man can know the thoughts of another man unless such is revealed by that man, in some way. Even so, no one can know the mind of God, and His plans, unless He chooses to reveal such (1 Corinthians 2:11). Revelation, not interpretation, is in view. God chose to reveal His plan through the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:10; Ephesians 3:1-5). God’s plan was revealed to His apostles and prophets by the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 3:1-5; 1 Corinthians 2:10, “us” cf. 1 Corinthians 1:23; 2:6; 2:10; 2:13; 2:16; 3:5-9; 4:8-13). (3) Verse 14-16. The spiritual man refers to the inspired prophet of God (1 Corinthians 14:37 cf. Hosea 9:7, where used in sarcasm of the false prophet). The natural man is man in his wisdom apart from revelation from God. Franklin Camp commented, “There could be no greater perversion of the truth than to take a passage that is contrasting inspired revelation though chosen men, with uninspired false teachers (natural men) whose teaching was of human origin, and make the passage refer to a sinner that has a completed open Bible before him and insist that he cannot understand what he reads unless the Holy Spirit dwelling in him interprets it for him… The consequences of making the natural man the sinner and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit the interpreter of the Scriptures would be infallibility. Does anyone think that the Holy Spirit in one, and interpreting the Scriptures, would ever be guilty of misinterpreting His own revelation?” (Camp, The Work of the Holy Spirit in Redemption, pp. 209-210).

Man can understand the Bible without a direct operation of the Holy Spirit. He did at Jerusalem (Acts 2:36-38). He did at Samaria (Acts 8:5, 12, 14-16). He did at Ephesus (Acts 19:1-6).

Posted in calvinism, Holy Spirit, Love, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Scars of Sin

Posted on May 25, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

2 Samuel 12:7-15 , “Then Nathan said to David, “You are the man!  Thus says the LORD God of Israel: ‘I anoint you king over Israel, and I delivered you from the hand of Saul. I gave you your master’s house and your master’s wives into your keeping, and gave you the house of Israel and Judah.  And if that had been too little, I also would have given you much more!  Why have you despised the commandment of the LORD, to do evil in His sight?  You have killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword; you have taken his wife to by your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the people of Ammon.  Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me, and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.’  Thus says the LORD: ‘Behold, I will raise up adversity against you from your own house; and I will take your wives before you eyes and give them to your neighbor, and he shall lie with your wives in the sight of this sun.  For you did it secretly, but I will do this thing before all Israel, before the sun.’  So David said to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the LORD.’  And Nathan said to David, ‘The LORD also has put away your sin; you shall not die.  However, because by this deed you have given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also who is born to you shall surely die.’  Then Nathan departed to his house.”

There are often lasting consequences, in this life, for sin.  David was forgiven.  However, his life never again would be the same.  Sin should not be taken lightly.

Consider, the following story which is contained in the book, The Moral Compass (edited by William J. Bennett).

Nails in the Post by M.F. Cowdery

There was once a farmer who had a son named John, a boy very apt to be thoughtless, and careless about doing what he was told to do.

One day his father said to him, “John, you are so careless and forgetful, that every time you do wrong, I shall drive a nail into this post, to remind you how often you are naughty.  And every time you do right I will draw one out”  His father did as he said he would, and every day he had one and sometimes a great many nails to drive in, but very seldom one to draw out.

At last John saw that the post was quite covered with nails, and he began to be ashamed of having so many faults.  He resolved to be a better boy, and the next day he was so good and industrious that several nails came out.  The day after it was the same thing, and so on for a long time, till at length only one nail remained.  His father then called him, and said: “Look, John, here is the very last nail, and now I’m going to draw it out.  Are you not glad?”

John looked at the post, and then, instead of expressing his joy, as his father expected, he burst into tears.  “Why,” said the father, “what is the matter?  I should think you would be delighted; the nails are all gone.”

“Yes,” sobbed John, “the nails are gone, but the scars are there yet”

So dear children, with your faults and bad habits; you may overcome them, you may by degrees cure them, but the scars remain.  Now, take my advice, and whenever you find yourselves doing a wrong thing, or getting into a bad habit, stop at once.  For every time you give in to it, you drive another nail, and that will leave a scar on your soul, even if the nail should be afterwards drawn out.

Posted in Forgiveness, Sin | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Holy Spirit: In Sanctification (Part 2)

Posted on May 23, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

Many in Christendom believe that sanctification, that is man being made holy, is accomplished by a direct operation of the Holy Spirit on the mind of man, the human heart. Calvinists believe that sanctification begins with irresistible grace (which leads to conversion) and continues through life (perseverance of the saints). The church of the Nazarene has another teaching. Influenced by the Wesleys, they teach the doctrine of second grace. This second grace is provided by a direct operation of the Holy Spirit. They teach that there are two types of sin. Actual sin (personal sin) is removed when one (with free will) repents and places his trust in Jesus. Original sin which taints man, affecting his inclinations, is removed following conversion and justification by a second working of grace. Both Calvinism and Wesleyanism teach a direct operation of the Holy Spirit. They simply place the direct operation at different points.

What does the Bible say about the Holy Spirit’s role in sanctification? Let us notice the New Testament passages which speak of both the spirit and sanctification.

The Offering of the Gentiles

Romans 15:19, “…I have written more boldly to you on some points, as reminding you, because of the grace given to me by God, that I might be a minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering of the Gentiles might be acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit. Therefore I have reason to glory in Christ Jesus in the things which pertain to God. For I will not dare to speak of any of these things which Christ has not accomplished through me, in word and deed, to make the Gentiles obedient – in mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God, so that from Jerusalem to Illyricum I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.”

Paul had been given grace (Romans 15:15). The reference is to miraculous gifts, even apostleship (f. Ephesians 4:7, 11 cf. 3:7; Romans 1:5; 12:6; cf. 15:15-16).

Paul’s objective was to use this gift to set the Gentiles before God as an acceptable sacrifice. It is highly figurative language. Remember that for a sacrifice to be accepted by God it had to be authorized (cf. Leviticus 10:1-2) and holy (Exodus 30:10; Leviticus 7:1, etc.). Grammatically, it is the “offering” being sanctified. The word translated, “’Gentiles’… is in the neuter gender, plural number, and genitive case and therefore cannot be that which is being sanctified. The only feminine gender, nominative case, and singular number noun in the sentence is the word… translated ‘offering’” (Fox, The Work of the Holy Spirit, Vol. 2, p. 80). The Holy Spirit sanctified the Gentiles as an acceptable offering.

How did the Holy Spirit sanctify the Gentiles? (1) The revelation which came by the Holy Spirit declared the Gentiles acceptable (Acts 10-11, 15; Galatians 2 -3). (2) The signs and wonders Paul did among the Gentiles were done by the power of the spirit of God. Paul did not do these things by his own human power.

Chose for Salvation

2 Thessalonians 2:13-14, “We are bound to give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth, to which He called you by our gospel, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Paul was thankful for these brethren. Why? The answer is: God had chosen them for salvation (keep in mind that a choice may involve standards – cf. Acts 6:2-6).

How did God choose them in context? Two things are mentioned: (1) “Sanctification of spirit.” This is the literal reading. The definite article is not present. Is this speaking of the Holy Spirit or the human spirit? This is not clear. If we assume that this refers to the Holy Spirit, let us ask how the Holy Spirit sanctifies in context. Man is called by the gospel (1 Thessalonians 2:14; Ephesians 2:18, 20 cf. 3:1-3a, 5-6). He is called to holiness (1 Thessalonians 4:7) and the obtaining of glory (2 Thessalonians 2:14). There is nothing here which demands a direct operation of the Holy Spirit. (2) “Belief in the truth.” The Holy Spirit provided the message. Man believes. Lynn Blair commented, “How did God choose them: Through two parts: God’s part (sanctification of the Spirit) and man’s part, or reaction (belief of the truth). God chose them through their belief of the truth” (Houston College of Bible Lectureship, Calvinism, p. 447).

Obedience

1 Peter 1:1-2, “Peter… to the pilgrims of the dispersion… elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ…”

Peter is writing to those who had been scattered due to persecutions (cf. Acts 8:4; 11:19). Life was difficult.

Yet, Peter reminds them, God had chosen them for salvation. This choice was according to foreknowledge of God. That is, it was according to His forethought and pre-arrangement (Thayer). God chose (planned) to save man (cf. 1 Peter 1:18-20; Ephesians 1:3-4a; 3:11).

God did not choose to save man unconditionally. Peter, in this same book, warned “…the Father… without partiality judges according to each one’s work, conduct yourself throughout the time of your stay here in fear” (1 Peter 1:17). Peter, in his second book, continued to exhort saying, “giving all diligence add to your faith virtue, to virtue knowledge, to knowledge self-control, to self-control perseverance, to perseverance godliness, to godliness brotherly kindness, and to brotherly kindness love… be ever more diligent to make your calling and election sure, for if you do these things you will never stumble; for so an entrance will be supplied abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 1:5-11).

There is again the  question of whether spirit refers to the Holy Spirit or the human spirit. The definite article is not present. There is no adjunct such as “Holy” or “of God” or “of the Lord.”

Assuming that this does refer to the Holy Spirit, what is the Spirit’s role in sanctification? Contextually, the Holy Spirit revealed the message of salvation (1 Peter 1:10-16). Remember that man is sanctified by the truth (John 17:17, 19).

Jesus’ role? Mentioned is the sprinkling of blood (1 Peter 1:2, 18-22). “Sprinkling” refers to His blood being applied to us (Hebrews 10:22 cf. 9:13, 19, 21; 11:28; 12:24). This is closely linked with baptism (Hebrews 10:22). Baptism is into the death of Christ (Romans 6:3).

Man’s role? The sanctification of the Spirit is for obedience. Again, there is a question of whether the Holy Spirit or the human spirit is in view. Later, in this chapter, Peter wrote, “you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit…” The article is present. Though, the words “through the Spirit” is a textual variant. However, the reason that we can obey the truth is because the Spirit has revealed the truth. It is not necessary to read into this a direct operation of the Holy Spirit.

Complete Sanctification

1 Thessalonians 5:23, “Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your who Spirit, soul and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

God has a sanctifying influence on man. This passage does not explain how God sanctifies. It is not necessary to read into this a direct operation of the Holy Spirit. We have already seen that He sanctifies through His truth (John 17:17, 19).

Remember: (1) One can hear and be converted before receiving the Holy Spirit. This was true at Jerusalem (Acts 2:36-38), at Samaria (Acts 8:4-5, 12, 14-17), and at Ephesus (Acts 19:1-6). (2) The Holy Spirit does not sanctify man with irresistible force (cf. 1 Thessalonians 4:1-8). It is man’s responsibility to present himself a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God. This is our reasonable service (Romans 12:1-2).

Posted in calvinism, Holy Spirit, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Eating Together

Posted on May 20, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

“These words which I command you today shall be in your heart.  You shall teach them diligently to your children, and you shall talk of them when you sit in your house…” (Deuteronomy 6:6-7).

The family sitting at the table together for breakfast and supper used to be common.  However, in this fast-paced world in which we live such has become less common.  “In the past 20 years, the frequency of family dinners has declined 33%” (thescramble.com/family-dinner-challenge-statistics).

There are several advantages to a family eating a meal at home together.  (1) Eating at home saves money.  In 2007 the average household spent $8 per meal outside of the home and only $4.50 per meal made in the home kitchen (cnn.com/2011/10/25/family-dinner).  Only about one-third of the price of a meal in a typical restaurant is food cost.  (2) Eating together is typically more nutritious and healthy.  The University of Minnesota found that family meals were associated with improved intakes of fruits, vegetables, grains, calcium rich foods, protein, iron, fiber, and vitamins A, C, E, B-6, and folate (cfs.purdue,edu/cff/spellsuccessfactsheet.p.d.f.) Children of families who eat together are 35% less likely to engage in an eating disorder, 24% more likely to eat healthier foods, and 12% less likely to be overweight (human.cornell/outreach/upload/family-dinner).

However, it is not just economics and nutrition.  There are other benefits.  Children not eating dinner with their families are 61% more likely to use alcohol, tobacco, or illegal drugs.  Children who eat dinner with their families nightly are 20% less likely to drink, smoke, or use illegal drugs.  Teens who share frequent family dinners are less likely to have sex at young ages, or be suspended from school (healthylearningpatterns.org/blog/dinner-statistics).  There is a correlation between the family meal and good behavior.

Families need to spend time together.  Sharing a meal and having a conversation around a table is one way to accomplish this.  Turn off the TV, and all electronic devices.  Enjoy each other’s company.

Posted in drugs, Family, Money, Parenting, Sex, Stats | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Holy Spirit: In Sanctification (Part 1)

Posted on May 18, 2015 by Bryan Hodge

Sanctification is “the separation of the believer from evil things and ways” (Vine’s). The verb “sanctify” refers to “the setting apart of the believer for God” (Vine’s), “to separate from things profane and dedicate to God” (Thayer). Sanctification could be rendered holification. Sanctify could be rendered holify.

Several things are involved in the sanctification of a saint. Let’s notice…

Blood

Hebrews 9:13-14, “For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?”

The argument is from the lesser to the greater. If animal sacrifices could purify a ceremonially unclean person (e.g. Numbers 19:2-12), how much more the blood of Christ do! His blood can cleanse our conscience of dead works. “Dead works” refers to sin (Hebrews 6:1 cf. 9:14) leading to death (Romans 6:16, James 1:15). The “conscience” refers to the recurring remembrance of sin on the day of atonement (Hebrews 1:3; 9:9; 9:14 cf. 10:1-3). Christ did not provide a temporary remedy for sin. He didn’t just cover it. He removed it.

He offered Himself by the eternal spirit. This may mean: (1) According to the eternal aim/purpose (cf. Ephesians 3:10-11 cf. Philippians 1:27). (2) According to His eternal spirit. That is, His divinity. (3) According to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (cf. Nehemiah 9:30; Mark 12:36, etc.).

Hebrews 10:9-10, “’Behold, I have come to do Your will O God’… By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”

Jesus accomplished what bulls and goats could not. The blood of bulls and goats did not offer a permanent remedy for man’s sin problem (Hebrews 10:3-4 cf. Leviticus 16:11-15). It took the blood of Christ (Hebrews 9:7, 12, 24-26).

Christians have been cleansed. Their hearts have been sprinkled from an evil conscience (Hebrews 10:22 cf. 9:13, 19, 21; 11:28; 12:24). Their bodies have been washed in pure water. That is, purifying water (cf. beautiful feet, Romans 10:15; not called beautiful for the beauty of the feet themselves, but beautiful for what the feet accomplish. Even so here, water purifies Acts 22:16; Ephesians 5:26). Remember that the Jordan river was not the purest of waters. Yet, it was used to baptize.

Hebrews 10:28-29, “Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy why has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing…”

Forsaking the assembly shows disrespect for the blood by which we are sanctified. Judgment is coming. “The LORD will judge His people” (Hebrews 10:30).

Hebrews 13:11-12, “For the bodies of those animals, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned outside the camp. Therefore, Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered outside the gate.”

There is a type- antitype picture. Sin offerings of old were offered outside the city or camp (Exodus 29:14; Leviticus 4:11, 12, 21; 9:11; 16:27; Numbers 19:3). Even so, Jesus was offered outside the city gates for our sanctification.

Word

John 17:17, “Sanctify them by Your word. Your word is truth.”

Jesus is praying to the Father. His prayer concerns the disciples. He did not pray that they be removed from this world. Instead, He prayed that they be kept from the evil one, sanctified by God’s word (John 17:14-15, 17-19). Guy Wood commented, “The people of God are sanctified, consecrated, dedicated to his service through obedience to the truth which has in it all that is necessary to enable them to live sober, righteously, and godly in this present world” (A Commentary on the Gospel According to John, p. 361).

John 17:19, “And for their sake I sanctify Myself, that they also may be sanctified by the truth.”

Jesus’ life (and death) allows us to be sanctified. Guy Woods commented, “The word ‘sanctify’ means to be set apart for holy purposes; to consecrate; the Lord’s entire life on earth involved just such consecration and dedication and he was now approaching the hour when he would make the supreme consecration – death on the cross; he would ask of the disciples no more than he would do himself; and thus his action became both an example and motivation for them. Wonderful though this was, it did not take the place and the need for sanctification of the apostles… The sanctification of our Lord provides an example for us but not a substitute; he still requires that his followers sanctify themselves in body, soul and spirit (1 Thessalonians 5:23), and live godly lives on earth” (ibid, p. 362).

Faith

Acts 26:16-28, “…I have appeared to you for this purpose, to make you a minister and a witness… to open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive the forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in me.”

Jesus has plans for Saul. He is sending him to the Gentiles. His mission: (1) Open their eyes. Help them see the truth (cf. Psalm 119:105; Luke 24:25-27 cf. 24:32). (2) Turn them from darkness to light, from Satan to God (cf. Colossians 1:13). That is, help them receive the forgiveness of sins (cf. Acts 2:38), and an inheritance in heaven (cf. 1 Peter 1:4).

Man is sanctified by faith (literally The Faith, The System of Faith) in Jesus. All spiritual blessings are found in Him (Ephesians 1:3; 1:7; 1:11).

Water

Ephesians 5:26, “He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word.”

The word “washing” is connected with water (Ephesians 5:26; Hebrews 10:22-23). It is connected with baptism (Acts 22:16). It is connected with the removing of sin (Acts 22:16; 1 Corinthians 6:11). The reference is to the sanctification of the church which was accomplished by baptism according to the word (Mark 16:15-16).

Spirit

Man is also sanctified by the Spirit (Romans 5:16; 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14; 1 Peter 1:1-2). We will consider these passages next time.

The issue is not: Does the Holy Spirit convert and sanctify? The issue is: How does the Holy Spirit convert and sanctify? It needs to be emphasized (regardless of one’s view on how the Holy Spirit indwells) the Holy Spirit does not sanctify man with irresistible force (cf. 1 Thessalonians 4:1-8).

Posted in calvinism, Dedication, Holy Spirit, Textual study, Word Study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment