Don’t Muzzle An Ox

You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain” (Deuteronomy 25:4 cf. 1 Corinthians 9:9; 1 Timothy 5:18).

This may concern a rented or borrowed animal.  Consider these words, “There are two basic options for the identity of the man to whom this command is directed: he is either (1) the owner of the ox, or (2) the someone borrowing or renting the ox… If the command is directly to the owner of the ox… it is difficult to understand why the stipulation is required in the first place.  Oxen were viewed as property, and there was a built-in motivation for maintaining one’s property to perform at a maximum level.  It is difficult to see why the command would make it into mosaic law given the self-interest that would already ensure such action… This leaves us with the situation of a man borrowing or renting an ox to thresh his own grain.  In that event, his self-interest would entail preserving as much of his threshed grain as possible; on the other hand, he would have no intrinsic motivation to let the ox eat of his grain.  If the animal ended up in a weakened state or unhealthy as a result, the situation does not result in any economic loss of his end” (Justin Taylor, Do Not Muzzle the Ox: Does Paul Quote Moses out of Context?, August 28, 2012, thegospelcoalition.org).  Furthermore, consider the context.  All other laws in context concern humans.  “Deuteronomy 25:4 in context is not fundamentally a law about how to treat animals humanely but rather a law about how to properly treat the property you are borrowing or renting from someone” (ibid).  This makes sense.  However, there are those who do mistreat even their own animals (Proverbs 12:10).

Paul quotes this verse twice: (1) In 1 Corinthians 9:9, he uses this passage to argue that preachers have the right to financial support.  He says, “If we have sown spiritual things for you, it is a great thing if we reap your material things?” (1 Corinthians 9:11).  (2) In 1 Timothy 5:18, he uses this passage to argue that elders have the right to financial support.  He not only quotes Deuteronomy 25:4, but also, quotes Luke 10:7 which says, “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”  It is worth pointing out that he refers to both passages as “The Scripture.” 

We should treat others fairly (cf. Matthew 7:12).  “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (Luke 10:7; 1 Timothy 5:18). 

Posted in animals, Elders and Deacons, law of moses, Preachers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Earth Day

The father of Earth Day was Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin.  He was deeply concerned over the Cuyahoga River in Ohio catching fire (June, 1969) and the Santa Barbara, California oil spill (January. 1969).  Nelson recruited Denis Hayes (commonly dubbed “Mr. Earth Day”) to organize “teach-ins” on college campuses in order to raise awareness of environmental issues.  The first Earth Day occurred on April 22, 1970 (coincidentally, this was the 100th birthday of Vladimir Lenin.  Earth Day supporters deny any connection).  “Earth Day inspired 20 million Americans – at the time 10% of the total population of the United States – to take to the streets, parks, and auditoriums to demonstrate against the impacts of 150 years of industrial development which lad left a growing legacy  of serious human health impacts…” (Our History, earthday.org).  “In 1990, Hayes organized a global Earth Day, with more than 200 million participants in more than 140 countries” (Earth Day, education.nationalgeographic.org).

What should Christians think of Earth Day?  Here are a few thoughts: (1) There is nothing wrong with wanting to protect the environment.  We should be good stewards of what God has given to us (Genesis 2:15; Deuteronomy 20:19-20; Proverbs 12:10; John 6:19-20). 

(2) We should not worship the Earth and creation (Romans 1:25).  In pantheism, there is no distinction between the Creator and the creation.  In panentheism, there is a distinction but not a sharp one.  In Judaism and Christianity there is a sharp distinction (Genesis 1:1; Numbers 23:19; Deuteronomy 4:15-19; Psalm 100:3; Isaiah 14:12-15; Ezekiel 28:1-2; Acts 17:24-25, 30-31; Romans 1:25, etc.).  God, not creation, should be worshiped.

(3) We should remember that while it is a good thing to care for this earth, this earth will not last.  We look for “a new heavens and a new earth” (2 Peter 3:10-13).  This earth is not our ultimate home.

(4) There are things which are even more important than protection of the planet.  (a) Man is here to seek the Lord and find Him (Acts 17:26-27).  If a man does not do this, no matter what else that he accomplishes, he has missed the point of life.  (b) We should live for eternity (2 Peter 1:5-11; Mark 8:36-37).  (c) We should seek to save others (Romans 1:14-16; Acts 8:4; 1 Peter 2:9-10).  (d) We should seek to bring glory on Earth to God (1 Corinthians 6:20; 10:31).  Let us not neglect these things.

Posted in History, holiday, Nature, Priorities, stewardship, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Demons and Swine

Now a large herd of swine was feeding there near the mountains.  So all the demons begged Him, saying, ‘Send us to the swine, that we may enter them.’  And at once Jesus gave them permission.  Then the unclean spirits went out and entered the swine (there was about two thousand); and the herd ran violently down the steep place into the sea, and drowned in the sea” (Mark 5:11-13; also, Matthew 8:30-32; Luke 8:32-33). 

This happened in the country of Gadarenes or Gerasenes (Mark 5:1 cf. Matthew 8:28; Luke 8:26).  Why the two place names?  Caleb Colley explains, “Matthew, Mark and Luke were writing of the same general.  The Roman city Gerasa was a famous city that would have been familiar to a Gentile audience, but Gadara, as the capital city of the Roman province of Perea was the chief of the ten cities in Decapolis, so even those who lived in Gerasa could have been called Gadarenes… It is clear that Matthew, Mark, and Luke did not contradict each other… In this instance, each writer intended to draw attention to an area close to the Sea of Galilee” (Caleb Colley, Did Jesus Go to Gerasa or Gadara?, apologeticspress.org).  Albert Barnes explains, “There is no contradiction… in the evangelists.  He came into the region in which two cities were situated, and one evangelist mentioned one, and the other another” (The Gospels, p. 91, comments on Matthew 8).  We should understand that Decapolis was ten Greek/Roman cities; This area was predominately gentile.     Here are some things that are clear from the Biblical text: (1) Jesus was recognized by demons (Matthew 8:29).  (2) Demons understood that there would be a coming time of torment for them (Matthew 8:29 cf. Luke 8:28, 31). (3) Jesus demonstrated great power.  At his word, a legion of demons were cast out (Matthew 8:30-31 cf., Mark 5:9-13; Luke 8:30-33).  (4) Some people have wrong priorities (Matthew 8:33-34).  They prioritize pork over people, swine over salvation, sausage over the Savior. 

Why did the demons ask to enter the swine?  We don’t know for sure.  Here are some possibilities which have been suggested: (1) It may be that they desired to inhabit bodies (cf. Luke 11:24-26).  This seems to have merit.  If so, why did these demons kill the swine?  It is possible that they did not intend to do so.  (2) It may be that they wanted to cause harm.  Physical and mental harm is associated with demon possession (cf. Mark 5:5; 5:13; 9:22).  (3) It may be that this was done to turn people against Jesus.  If this were intended, it had some success (cf. Mark 5:17). 

Why did Jesus grant their request?  Once again, we don’t know.  Here are some possibilities which have been suggested: (1) He may have wanted to demonstrate the real presence of these evil demons.  This was not the case of a mere deranged mind.  Roy Lanier Sr. commenting on Mark 5 wrote, “I am not a physician, but I do not know of any human disease which could so quickly be contracted by hogs that would cause the hogs to jump into the sea” (Lanier, 20 Years of the Problem Page, Vol. 1, p. 124).  (2) He may have wanted to expose the true nature of evil.  It leads to distress and destruction.  (3) Some have suggested that this was allowed for punishment.  It is thought, by some, that the owners or keepers of the swine may have been Israelites.  However, this is far from certain.  This area was associated with gentiles.  (4) Some have suggested that Jesus allowed this to expose the improper priorities of the people of that area. They certain had improper priorities. However, it is not clear that this is the reason. (5) Moreover, some suggest that he may have wanted to show that it wasn’t Israel alone who rejected him; gentiles did as well (assuming these were gentiles, which is possible but not certain).  However, it is not clear that this is the reason.  

Lessons

One: Jesus wanted the healed man to do something after being healed.  He said, “Go home to your friends, and tell them what great things the Lord has done for you, and how He has had compassion on you” (Mark 5:19).  We are told, “And he departed and began to proclaim in Decapolis all that Jesus had done for him; and all marveled” (Mark 5:20).  We are to do the same (1 Peter 2:9-10; Acts 8:4).           

    Two: Jesus had power over evil.  He had power to heal the demon possessed.  He also had power to heal us of sin (Matthew 9:4-7; 26:28; Acts 2:36-38; 1 John 1:7).

    Posted in animals, Apologetics, Demons, Priorities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

    Even the Dogs

    Then she came and worshipped Him, saying, ‘Lord, help me!’  But He answered and said, ‘It is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the little dogs.   And she said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the little dogs eat the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.’  Then Jesus answered and said to her, ‘O woman, great is your faith!  Let it be as you desire.  ‘And her daughter was healed from that very hour” (Matthew 15:25-28 cf. Mark 7:25-30). 

    The place was in the region of Tyre and Sidon.  These were cities of Phoenicia   (today located in Lebanon).  This was gentile land.

    Why was Jesus and his disciples there?  Perhaps, this was a short retreat from the crowds, a vacation.  We are told that Jesus “entered a house and wanted no one to know it” (Mark 7:24).

    A woman came to him.  Matthew describes her as “a woman of Canaan from that region” (Matthew 15:22).  Mark described her as “a Greek, a Syro-Phoenician by birth” (Mark 7:26).  She had a daughter that was demon possessed.

    At first, Jesus did not answer her (Matthew 15:23).  Why not?  Did he not care?  Surely, this is not the answer.  I believe that: (1) Jesus was responding as a typical Jew would, and even as his disciples would.  (2) He is doing so to reveal her great faith and to teach the disciples a lesson.

    The disciples did not want to be bothered by the woman.  They urged Jesus, “Send her away, for she cries out after us” (Matthew 15:23).  They had no time for her. Did they want Jesus to send her away without helping her? Some think this is the case. Did they want Jesus to quickly give her what she wants and send her away? Some think this is possibly the meaning. Either way, they seem to want to get rid of her.

    Jesus finally spoke saying, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:28).  Was this addressed to the woman?  Or was Jesus replying to the disciples?  Commentators are divided.  Either way, she heard what Jesus said.  Here are a couple of things to keep in mind: (1) It is true that Jesus’ mission was to Israel (Matthew 1:21; Luke 1:68, 77 cf. 2:32; Matthew 10:5-6; Romans 15:8).  (2) However, it should be remembered that Jesus already had shown interest in and had done kind acts for non-Israelites (See John 4:5-42; Matthew 8:5-13).  [Note: The word Jesus used for “dog” was not the word which is else-where used to describe poor character (kuon, Matthew 7:6; Philippians 3:2; 2 Peter 2:22; Revelation 22:15). The word used (kunarion) is softer. It was used of puppies and household pets (see BDAG). Marvin Vincent says, ” The picture is of a family meal with the pet house-dogs running around the table” (studylight.org)]

    The woman did not give up.  She was persistent.  She acknowledged the priority of Israel in his mission.  Then, she said, ‘even the little dogs eat the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table” (Matthew 15:27). Her response was perfect, on cue.

    Jesus responded favorably.  He commends her great faith.  Twice Jesus pointed out gentiles with great faith (Matthew 8:10; 15:28).  He healed her daughter. 

    Lessons

    Here are some lessons for us to learn: (1) In life there are responsibilities, and priorities which come with these responsibilities.  A Christian is provided these priorities: (a) The first priority is his household (immediate family); (b) The second is his own (extended family, family not living with him); (c) Third is the household of faith (church members); (d) Fourth is all others as one has opportunity (See: 1 Timothy 5:3-4, 8, 16; Galatians 6:10).  Time and other resources must be prioritized.  (2) Even when a matter is outside one’s mission or priorities, if good may be done without sacrificing or harming the mission, then it should be done.  “Even the little dogs eat the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table” (Matthew 15:27).  “Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all, especially to those who are of the household of faith” (Galatians 6:10).  (3) Some gentiles had great faith (Matthew 8:10; 15:28).  We should not judge one’s spiritual interest by his nationality.  Faith is individual.  I believe that Jesus wanted his disciples to see this.  He had other sheep to call (John 10:16).  He would send the apostles into all the world (Matthew 28:18-20; Mark 16:15-16; Luke 24:46-49; Acts 1:8).

    Posted in animals, Faith, Word Study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

    Dogs and Hogs

    Dogs and hogs are both intelligent animals.  Both frequently appear on lists of the most intelligent animals. 

    However, there are things that are not appreciated or valued by these animals.  Consider how Jesus used this in his teaching. 

    Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and tear you in pieces” (Matthew 7:6). 

    The holy is not to be presented to dogs.  To what does “holy” refer?  (1) This seems to refer to that which has been sacrificed to God.  In some sacrifices, the priests and holy worshippers were permitted to eat part of the meat (e.g. Leviticus 6:24-30; 7:15-21).  What was not ate was to be burned (Leviticus 7:17).  It was not to be fed to the dogs.  They would not appreciate the meaning and significance of the sacrifice (2) William Barclay suggested that an earring could be intended.  He explained that the Hebrew word for holy (kadash or qadosh) and the Aramaic word for earring (kadasha or qadasha) contain the same consonants and that Hebrew was then written without vowels (William Barclay, The Gospel of Matthew, studylight.org).  It is an interesting theory.  However, the current textual evidence that we have is from Greek manuscripts, not Hebrew. No standard English translation renders it “earring” (The Passion Translation does).

    Pearls are not for swine.  They will not appreciate the value of the pearls (cf. Matthew 13:45-46).  They want food, not pearls.  Consider these words by J.W. McGarvey, “If a herd of hungry and ferocious hogs are called to be fed, and instead of grain you throw them a basket of pearls, they will not only trample the pearls under their feet, but in their eagerness for the expected food they may rush upon you, pull you down, and tear you to pieces” (J.W. McGarvey, On Matthew and Mark, p. 70).  We should keep in mind that the swine are probably feral or undomesticated.  Swine was unclean to Israelites (Leviticus 11:7-8; Deuteronomy 14:8). 

    What is the message?  This is not about literal dogs and hogs.  (1) This concerns correction (notice context Matthew 7:1-6).  Jesus is teaching that not all will properly receive correction (cf. Proverbs 9:7-8; 15:12; 23:9).  J.W. McGarvey commented, “Some men, when you press the claims of truth on their attention, will not only despise the truth, but persecute you for annoying them with it.  When such men are known they are to be avoided” (ibid).  (2) There is an application to preaching.  The kingdom of heaven is compared to a pearl of great price (Matthew 13:45-46).  However, not all will appreciate its value.  Consider these words, “In the teaching of the truth we must spend some time in judging or discerning the receptiveness of the people we are seeking to reach.  This can be readily seen by the way they treat the word.  If they have no more regard for truth than a ‘dog’ has for holiness or a ‘hog’ has for pearls, then we should move on to more fruitful fields of endeavor.  The Bible is too sacred a volume to allow godless souls to trample it underfoot and even persecute us for presenting the ‘Good News’” (Kerry Knight in the book The Sermon on the Mount, 7th Annual Spiritual Sword Lectureship, p. 231).  Time is short.  Those needing salvation are many.  If someone makes clear that he does not appreciate the message, then move on to another who does appreciate it.  Let us not waste precious time and energy on those without interest.     

    Fun Fact:  Have you heard of Hogzilla?  It was shot in Alapaha, Georgia in 2004 by Chris Griffin on Ken Holyoak’s hunting preserve.  It was reported to have been 12 feet long and weighted 1,000 pounds.  National Geographic exhumed the body.  They concluded that it was between 7 ½ and 8 feet long and weighed 800 pounds.  It was a hybrid of wild and domesticated swine (The Mystery of Hogzilla Solved, abcnews.go.com; Legend of Hogzilla Proven True, espn.com).

    Posted in animals, evangelism, Preaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Pigs with Gold Rings

    As a ring of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a lovely woman who lacks discretion” (Proverbs 11:22).

    The book of Proverbs contains many wise sayings, that set forth advice and general truths for life.  These are designed to keep people, especially  young men, from mistakes and bad choices in life (cf. Proverbs 1:1-6, 8-9, 10; 2:1-2; 3:1-4, 11-12; 4:1-2, 10-13, 20-22; 5:1-6, 7-13, 20-21; 6:1-5, 20-24; 7:1-5, etc.). 

    One of the greatest decisions one makes in life is whom to marry. This book says much about this.  Consider: (1) “An excellent wife is the crown of her husband, but she who causes shame is like rottenness in his bones” (Proverbs 12:4).  (2) “Better to dwell in a corner of a housetop, than in a house shared with a contentious woman (Proverbs 21:9).  (3) “Better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman” (Proverbs 21:19).  (4) “Who can find a virtuous wife?  For her worth is far above rubies” (Proverbs 31:10).  (5) “Charm is deceitful and beauty is passing but a woman who fears the LORD, she shall be praised” (Proverbs 31:30).

    In the text quoted above (Proverbs 11:22), a simile (a figure of speech which makes a comparison using “like” or “as”) is set forth.  A woman without discretion (translated “judgment” in Psalm 119:66) is compared to a swine.  Her loveliness or physical beauty is compared to a gold ring.  The point is that physical beauty does not overcome ugliness of her character.  It is in modern words: “lipstick on a pig.” 

    True beauty is found in godliness.  “Charm is deceitful and beauty is passing, but a woman who fears the LORD, she shall be praised” (Proverbs 31:30). Consider this modern saying: “Beauty is but skin deep, ugly to the bone. And when beauty fades away, ugly claims its own.”

    Posted in animals, Marriage, Proverbs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Fattened Cows

    Well-fed bovine cattle can be very large.  The tallest and largest breed is the Chianina.  In this breed, a cow (female) can be 5 feet tall, and more than 2,000 pounds and a bull can be 5 ½ feet tall and weigh 3,500 pounds (Chianina, the cattlesite.com).  Holstein can be very large.  Blosom, a Holstein Friesian, is believed to be the tallest cow ever.  She stood 6 feet, 2 inches tall (Meet Record-Breaking Cows Whose Short and Tall Statures Earned a Place in History by Vickie Newman, published July 11, 2023, guinessworldrecords.com).  Romeo, a Holstein Friesian, is listed as the tallest living steer.  He stands 6 feet 4 ½ inches (Tallest Steer Romeo Grows to Record Height After Being Rescued from Slaughter by Vickie Newman published May 22, 2024, ibid).  Imagine the food required each day to sustain an animal of this size.

    In this writing we will examine two passages.  These passages refer to fattened cows. 

    Hear this word, you cows of Bashan, who are on the mountains of Samaria, who oppress the poor, who crush the needy, who say to your husbands, ‘Bring wine, let us drink!’  The Lord GOD has sworn by His holiness; “Behold, the days shall come upon you when He will take you away with fishhooks, and your posterity with fishhooks’” (Amos 4:1-2).

    Bashan (today’s Golan Heights) was a fertile region east and northeast of the Sea of Galilee.  It was known for its agricultural production and its well-fed cattle (cf. Deuteronomy 32:14; Psalm 22:12; Jeremiah 50:19; Ezekiel 39:18; Micah 7:14).

    This is a picture of a pampered luxurious life.  Some in Israel so lived.  The issue was not their wealth.  The issue was that some maintained this lifestyle by mistreating others (Amos 2:6-8;  4:1-2; 5:11-12).  Some were self-absorbed and unconcerned for others (Amos 6:3-7). 

    Women (wives) are specifically mentioned (Amos 4:1-2 cf. Isaiah 3:16, 18-ff).  Why?  This makes clear that it was not only the men who were guilty.  [Note: The comparison to cows of Bashan is not about weight but about a pampered, easy life.]   Some of the wives had incited their husbands in this.  They were not godly but materialistic.  The character of women has an important and significant influence on a home, church, and even a nation.

    Captivity was coming.  They appeared to be living the good life.  They were about to be taken away with fishhooks (Amos 4:1-2; 6:7).  “The Assyrians literally led captives by ropes and hooks, drawn through the nose or lips of captives, as stone reliefs from that era reveal” (Wayne Jackson, The Prophets, p. 397). 

    You have lived on the earth in pleasure and luxury; you have fattened your hearts as in the day of slaughter” (James 5:5).

    The message is much the same.  Again, this concerns the rich.  The problem is not their riches (per se); nor does it seem to be pleasure or luxury (cf. 1 Timothy 6:17-19; James 1:9).  However, there is the possibility, based on word selection, that this is describing wasteful living (cf. Guy N. Woods, The Epistle of James, p. 267).  The reason for the rebuke is that they had enriched themselves by cheating others out of their wages (James 5:4 cf. Leviticus 19:13; Deuteronomy 24:14-15; Jeremiah 22:13). 

    There will be a day of judgment.  While they live on earth in pleasure, they were like fatten cattle that would be slaughtered.  Guy Woods comments, “They were fattening their own hearts; but what they did not take into account was the fact that they were fattening themselves for a day of slaughter – their own!  The day of slaughter is judgment” (Woods, p. 268).

     Let’s remember that true riches are not on earth but in heaven, and the hereafter.  Are you truly rich?  (cf. Luke 12:13-21; 16:19-13; 9:25). 

    Posted in animals, Ethics, Judgment, prophets, Wealth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

    Dogs and Pigs

    For if, after they have escaped the pollution of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning.  For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them.  But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: ‘A dog returns to his own vomit,’ and ‘a sow, having washed, to wallowing in the mire.’” (2 Peter 2:21-22 cf. Proverbs 26:11). 

    The ones under consideration had “escaped the pollution of the world” (2 Peter 2:20 cf. 2:18).  They did so “through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 2:20, cf. “error” 2:18).  The word “know” appears in some form 16 times in the book of 2 Peter [(1) Knowledge (1:2, 3, 5, 6, 8; 2:20; 3:18) (2) Know(s) (1:12, 2:9; 3:17); (3) Knowing (1:14, 20; 3:3); (4) Known (1:16; 2:21 x 2)] Knowledge is part of the ingredient for spiritual success (2 Peter 1:5-11). 

    What if these do not continue to live as Christians?  What if “they are again entangled” and “overcome”?  What if they “turn from the holy commandment delivered to them?  Peter writes: (1) “The latter end is worse for them than the beginning” (2 Peter 2:20).  (2) It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment” (2 Peter 2:21). 

    What does this mean?  (1) This may refer to the fact that it is very difficult to regain those who willfully choose to leave the way of righteousness (cf. Hebrews 6:4-6).  (2) This may refer to greater knowledge leading to greater expectations, and possibly greater severity in judgment (Luke 12:42-48; Hebrews 10:26-29).

    In order to show how disgusting it is to turn back, Peter used two proverbs.  (1) He refers to a dog that returns to its own vomit (2 Peter 2:22 cf. Proverbs 26:11).  (2) He refers to a sow (female pig) that has been washed returning to the mire.  This second proverb does not appear earlier in scripture.  However, it was probably a well-known saying in Peter’s day.  Adam Clarke cites a Jewish midrash (commentary) which says, “Orphah is returned to her mire, Ruth persevered in spirit.”

    Some have missed the point.  They suggest that the dog and pig were never changed in nature (Calvinism).  This is why they returned to the vomit and mire.

    However, this is not the point of the text.  It is not about their unchanged nature.  It is about the forsaking of the right way (notice: 2 Peter 2:1-2, 15, 21).  Guy N. Woods comments, “The dog has ejected that which was foul; the sow had been washed.”  However, both returned to the filth.  May we never return to the filth. 

    Posted in animals, calvinism, Proverbs, Sin, Textual study | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Thoughts After a Year

    It has been more than a year since I was detained, interrogated for hours, denied entry, locked up, threatened with prosecution, and unceremoniously sent home by immigration officials in India.  This writing is designed to explain what happened and provide my thoughts a year later.

    Details

    The immigration officer, at his cubicle, looked through my passport and asked: “Where is your visa?”  I showed it to him.  It was on the page that he had already produced for him.  He said, “No, your other visa.”  He said, “This is a tourist visa.  You need a missionary visa.”  I had not yet stated the purpose of my visit.  Immediately, I realized that I must be on some list.  I replied that I did not need a missionary visa.  I explained that I had carefully read the details concerning the various visas available.  I was not a missionary according to the description on their website. 

    He asked why I was there.  I told him that I was there to see friends.  He asked if these friends were church members.  I informed him that they were. He asked if I planned to assemble and worship with these friends. I said that I did.  Again, he said, “You need a missionary visa.”  Again, I disputed this point. 

    He asked to see my phone.  He went into my pictures.  He found some pictures of baptisms which had been recently sent to me from a preacher in India.  He asked, “What is this?”  I answered that it looked like baptisms to me.  Then, I pointed out that the dates on these pictures. I was not in India when these pictures were taken a few weeks earlier.

    He wanted to further interrogate me.  He closed his cubicle and moved me to a bench outside his supervisor’s office.  He questioned me over the next few hours.  He would ask a few questions, leave for an extended period of time, and returned with more questions.  This cycle occurred many times.  (1) He searched my phone’s contact list.  He took down the names and numbers of those with names or numbers of obvious Indian origin.  He asked me where each of these lived and if they were church members.  (2) He took me to a computer and pulled up pictures of church buildings (Catholic, Anglican, Church of South India, etc.) from the places in which my contacts lived.  He asked, “Is this where they attend?”  He showed me many pictures.   He became frustrated and accused me of lying when I told him that none of the church buildings were where my friends attended. I suppose that if it is not on the internet, then it must not exist. (3) He asked me if I was a Catholic or a Protestant.  I told him that I was neither Catholic nor Protestant.  He claimed that these were the only options.  I told him that I was simply a Christian.  He asked me to explain to him the difference between Catholic and Protestant.  I tried to provide him a simple answer.  It was clear to me that he understood very little about these things, or the Bible itself.  (4) He asked to what church I belonged.  I told him I was a member of the church of Christ.  He said that there was no such church.  I insisted that it existed.  (5) He asked several political questions.  He asked for whom I would cast my vote in the next presidential election.  I told him that I did not know whom the nominees would be and asked “do you?”  He asked for whom I voted in the last election.  I told him that I did not see what that had to do with my entry into his country.  He asked if I was a Republican or a Democrat.  When I refused to answer, he said, “You are from Texas.  Your Senators are Cornyn and Cruz.  They are both Republicans.  Therefore, you must be a Republican.”  I told him that that did not logically follow.  (6) He asked me why I had visited certain cities in the past.  Note: For the last several years, hotels have been required to scan the passports of their foreign guests.  I told him that in some places it was due to travel, in other places I was visiting friends or visiting with a church, and in some cases, I was vacationing.  (7) He asked me how much money I was carrying on me.  I thought here it is; he wants a bribe.  However, he never asked for such.  I told him that I had about $3,000 (USD).  He said, “That is too much.”  I told him that it was not.  I was allowed to carry up to $5,000 without declaring it.  He said that I was correct.  However, I did not need to carry that much.  (8) He asked me what I was going to do with the money.  I told him that the money would be used for food, lodging, travel, possible unexpected needs, and possibly gifts to my friends.  He said that if I gave any money to any church member for any reason (e.g., medical assistance, educational assistance, transportation) it could be viewed as illegal activity.  (9) He then mentioned a few names. These were church members from America.  He asked my relationship with them.  I told him that they were Christians known to me.  He asked when they would return to India.  I told him that I had no idea. (10) He produced a handwritten statement for me to sign.  It read something like, “I, William Bryan Hodge, passport number xxxxxx, did knowingly try to illegally enter the country of India on the date of xxxx.”  I refused to sign.  He asked, “What shall I do with this statement?”  I answered, “I don’t care.  Eat it if you like.” (It was time to eat.)

    He informed me that I had twenty-four hours to find a way out of the country or they would prosecute me.  I called my wife who went to work.  It was not easy.  All flights were booked on all carriers.  However, American Airlines, working with British Airways, found a way to get me home.

    Next, he instructed a soldier to lock me up.  I was taken to a small holding room with bars on the door.  I was locked inside with a guard assigned to sit outside the room.  Hours went by without food or water.  When the shifts changed a new guard was assigned outside the door.  He opened the door and entered.  He quietly said that he too was a Christian.  He apologized for my treatment and said this was becoming common.  He asked if I needed anything.  I told him that my phone needed charging and that I could use some food and drink.  He charged my phone from a plug which was visible from the bars on my door.  He brought me some food and water. He purchased this himself from a restaurant in the airport.  I think it had been about seventeen hours since I had eaten or drunk anything. He told me that he would stay on duty and take care of me until I departed the country.  He did.

    I boarded a flight to London the next day. An immigration officer handed my passport to a British Airways pilot and told him to not give it back to me until I landed. 

    At Heathrow Airport in London, I met a young Nigerian in the wee hours of the morning.  He lived in London, where he worked as an accountant, and was traveling to Nigeria to propose to his girlfriend but had missed his flight.  It was just the two of us in an empty, very cold part of the airport (the heat seemed to be off).  He was reading a book about miracles.  He asked me if I was a Christian.  I told him that I was.  He said that he had many questions about the Bible.  He said that he was not able to work miracles as some claimed to be able; did this mean that he wasn’t a Christian?  We had a Bible study in the airport. We spent several hours together. When the coffee and pastry shop opened, we were the first customers. We continued our talk until our flights separated us. One never knows when and where opportunities will arise.

    Five days after I had departed for India, I was back home.  I had not changed clothes, or bathed, in five days. I must have looked and smelled a mess.  But my wife and friends welcomed me back with open arms. 

    Thoughts

    1.  This was a major event in my life.  It so troubled me that I refused to write about it for a year.  I had traveled to India dozens of times over the last nearly a quarter century. I made my first trip in January 2002, just a few months after that terrible day of 9-11. I have helped some churches become organize with elders and deacons. Brethren in America sent help to some of these churches after the 2004 tsunami (note: amazingly, one church in India returned the kindness and sent help to the congregation where my parents attend after a hurricane struck the gulf coast).  Over the years, I have been a part in thousands of baptisms and have helped plant a few churches.  An entire 7th Day Adventist church was converted on one trip. I have been allowed to speak at Baptist churches, Pentecostal churches, and 7th Day Adventist churches, Preachers have been converted. Some of the brethren have become like family to me. In some congregations, I have worked with three generations of family members. I have watched children grow up, marry, and have children. One city honored me at holiday event and thanked me for working in their city. I have spoken to children in a private school. I have taught classes in two schools of preaching in India. One of the schools has had as many as 100 students in class. Alas, I may not ever be able to go back. It still truly saddens me.

    2.  I have come to realize that this is not the end of my work. I am now teaching the book of Acts to some Indian brethren by Zoom each Monday morning.  I am answering questions by email and through WordPress. I have discussed the possibility of meeting a couple of preachers in another country.

    3.  I am so thankful for the fervent prayers that went up for me. Many prayed for my safe return home.

    4.  We need to keep the Indian brethren in our prayers.  Some leaders of that country want India to be Hindu only. It is not easy being a Christian in India today.

    5. It is their work. Ultimately, this work must be carried on by the brethren in India, I have known this all along. I believe that they will continue the good work.

    6.  Critics abound. Word came to me that one supporting congregation had those in a business meeting who questioned supporting me on another trip (to a different country) because I had been kicked out of a country.  The preacher told me that some thought that we should not alienate countries but work with them.  This is from a group of men who have never been on an evangelistic trip to a foreign country and who did not know the facts (nor, had they contacted me to clarify the facts). Someone has said that if you want to avoid criticism: say nothing, do nothing, be nothing. It seems to me that this is the philosophy of many. Let us not be content being “armed chair quarterbacks.” Theodore Roosevelt once said ” It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena …” Let us each be in the arena seeking to bring souls to Christ, and edify our brothers and sisters in Christ, and may we do this to the glory of God. Let us go everywhere preaching the word (Acts 8:4).

    7. Accurate information. One preacher told me that he had read my report of what happened. I am not sure what he read; however, I have not released a written report on this until now.

    Let’s some things straight.  (1) What I do is illegal in India even with a missionary visa.  “A Missionary visa is granted to a foreigner whose sole objective of visiting India is missionary work not involving proselytization.  Visa shall NOT be granted to preachers and evangelists who desire to come to India on propagation campaigns, whether on their own or at the invitation of any organization in India.”  Those who may be granted a missionary visa includes, “Bishops, superiors, etc. of foreign missionary organizations who desire to visit or inspect the workings of their institution in India” (Details of visas granted by India, mha.gov.in).  Notice, evangelism is not legal for foreigners.  Moreover, I do not claim to be a Bishop (overseer) or supervisor of any church in India. Countries that issue missionary or religious visas do so for a couple of reasons. They may do so to expedite entry for missionaries and religious workers. They may do so to limit or restrict missionary activities. The latter clearly is what India is doing. (2) Technically, a missionary visa is not available to me.  The Minister of Home Affairs says, “Applications from foreign missionaries coming to work in new foreign missionary centres will be considered only if the society concerned has obtained permission from the Government of India for opening the centre.  A list of recognized foreign missionary societies in India is given in Appendix X.  No new society will ordinarily be recognized” (mha.gov.in).  The List of Recognized Catholic Societies include 65 societies.  The List of Recognized Protestant Societies include 48 denominations and societies.  These organizations are greater than an individual local church.  The church of Christ is not recognized.  This is probably why the officer insisted that the church of Christ did not exist.  Let us realize that all authority ultimately resides in God.  No earthly government has authority to hinder the preaching of the Gospel (Acts 4:18-20; 5:27-29).  This is an over-reach of the authority delegated to them.  Let us be as bold as lions. Furthermore, let us be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves.

    Posted in evangelism, Government, Prayer | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

    Worshipping as Dogs

    You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only shall you serve” (Matthew 4:10 cf. Deuteronomy 6:13).

    God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth” (John 4:24).

    The affection commonly seen in a dog for its master is amazing.  When the Master comes home the dog’s tail wags.  The dog may run and jump.  The dog may even lick the master’s hand.  The dog is happy to be in the presence of the master. 

    What does this have to do with worship?  The word translated “worship” in the passage above is proskuneo.  It is derived from pros (meaning: to or towards) and kuneo (meaning: kiss).  Some believe that kuneo (meaning: kiss) is derived from kuon (meaning: dog).  One source suggests, “It evolved from its original meaning to represent first the kiss of ‘a dog licking a hand,’ and then simply, ‘to kiss’ …The basic meaning of proskuneo is ‘to bow down to the ground before someone and kiss his feet, the hem of his garment, or the ground in front of him” (Bill Klein, Greek Thoughts, studylight.org). 

    It is not wise to read too much into the origin of words.  The etymological fallacy assumes that a word’s current or intended usage is tied to, or is similar to, a word’s origin.  For example: (1) If someone today speaks of “September,” “October,” “November,” or “December” – he probably does not mean the seventh, eighth, nineth or tenth month of the year.  (2) If someone today speaks of “manure” – he probably is not speaking of working with hands or cultivating land by hand. (3) If someone today speaks of “disaster” – he probably is not speaking of a star.

    However, I say that we can learn from the dog.  Wouldn’t it be great if all approached God with the devotion and loving affection that a dog has for its master?

    *I want to credit brother Danny Rager of Bridgeport, Alabama for prompting these thoughts.  He and I discussed these things on a recent trip to Guyana. 

    Posted in animals, Word Study, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment